1987
DOI: 10.1021/ie00070a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance

Abstract: The effectiveness of disturbance suppression in a multivariable control system can depend strongly on the direction of the disturbance. The "disturbance condition number" is introduced to quantify the effect of disturbance direction on closed-loop performance. As an example a two-point composition control system for a distillation column is analyzed for various disturbance and set-point changes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model uncertainties Skogestad and Morari (1987) studied the effects of model uncertainties on control performances. Uncertainties in the process model require that the actual controller be detuned and hence degrade the control performance.…”
Section: 324mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model uncertainties Skogestad and Morari (1987) studied the effects of model uncertainties on control performances. Uncertainties in the process model require that the actual controller be detuned and hence degrade the control performance.…”
Section: 324mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that, (P) should have been computed for all IO sets of that dimension. Skogestad and Morari (1987a) consider the disturbance condition number. For the kth disturbance d I in Fig.…”
Section: The Condition Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaling used for condition number calculations depends on whether it is being used for manipulated constraint assessment or for uncertainty assessment. Johnston and Barton (1987) and Skogestad and Moran (1987) recommend scalings for manipulated constraint analysis. Perkins and Wong (1985) and Moran and Skogestad (1985) suggest scalings to minimise the condition number for robustness analysis.…”
Section: Controllability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%