Effect of Distance on Open Innovation: Differences among Institutions According to Patent Citation and Reference

Yun, JinHyo Joseph; Jeong, EuiSeob; Lee, ChangHwan; Park, JinSeu; Zhao, Xiaofei

doi:10.3390/su9081478

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another study measured the breadth of open innovation through the ratio of jointly applied patents from the total patents of a firm, and the depth of open innovation by the average number of joint applicants of each patent of a firm [37]. Another study analyzed the effect of distance on open innovation and its difference among institutions, and used the ratio of patents with joint applicants and the average number of joint applicants of each patent to measure the depth and breadth of open innovation, respectively [38]. In many studies, the co-invention index has been used to examine inter-and intranational collaborations in inventive activities, and the co-assignee index was used to examine intended inter-and intranational collaborations of the commercialization of inventive activities [39].…”

Section: Research Scope and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea

Yun

Jeong

Lee³

et al. 2018

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Korean industrial environment has been rapidly changing. As a result, several industries are facing different innovation conditions, including: the automotive industry, which is a traditional manufacturing industry in Korea; the aerospace industry, which has been vertically integrated, and has been led by a single large company-Korea Aerospace Industries-since Korea went through an economic crisis in the 1990s; and the robotics industry, which is currently emerging. This study used parameters related to patents originating from the automobile, robotics, and aerospace fields. The patents subjected to analysis were those registered in Korea from 2001 to 2014, and included those that were applied for, jointly applied for, or registered by Korean companies. This study analyzed the differences caused by the effect of open innovation in the three industries. According to our results, first, the three industries experienced different effects of open innovation. Second, when large companies controlled a given industry, open innovation either worked a little or did not work at all. According to this research result, the Korean robotics industry, which has a weak dominance of large companies, experienced a strong effect of open innovation, in that joint patent applications led to economic gains from the patents and an increase in technology transfer and technology value. The aerospace industry of Korea, which has the highest dominance of large companies, experienced a slight effect of open innovation, as the effect of joint patent application only improved the technology value. Finally, the automotive industry of Korea had an intermediate level of open innovation, between the aerospace and robotics sectors.

show abstract

Section: Research Scope and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea

Yun

Jeong

Lee³

et al. 2018

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, there are relations between the distance between technology and the market, and open innovation. The same studies indicate that the distance between technology and the market was found to moderate the open innovation effect in Fortune 500 companies and laboratories [66]. The recent CPMTT's projects and activities have proven to be effective and efficient in facilitating and developing technology transfer, whether we talk about studies and analyzes on the correlation of university curricula with the requirements of the Socio-Economic environment (studying and applying new technologies, alignment to new standards, etc.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University

Vac

Fiţiu

2017

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:To improve university and commercial ties with industry, many universities operate a technology transfer office (TTO) as a vehicle to support the creation of spin-off companies. Run effectively, the TTO can define roles and responsibilities, structures and processes that support the creation and development of new ventures. The challenge for universities is to create TTOs with the right skill set. This paper aims to analyze the TTO activities to support transforming research outputs into commercialization in the context of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca, Romania (UASVMCN). Throughout this paper, different commercialization channels, the roles of technology transfer offices and multiple associative structures are further discussed with a special focus on agricultural open innovations and technologies. This study contributes to sustainable development of both Academia and agricultural Industry research, development and commercialization activities by illustrating current innovation and technology transfer activities produced by UASVMCN and its own TTO as a catalyst entity, a new model in Romania, so that the Academia-TTO-Economy partners association draw a functional and productive triple helix. In order to assess the sustainability of using the above-mentioned TTO, the methodological tools involving analysis are implemented. Finally, this paper states that correct operating of a university TTO is a real opportunity for technology transfer, both from the perspective of an alternative to research funding or entrepreneurship, and from the cultural perspective of the university correlation to the current trends in research, innovation and technology transfer, on a unique and entrepreneurial European market.

show abstract

“…Moreover, the adoption of the complexity lens allows to better evaluate the transformational patterns affecting the development of innovation in an open approach enhanced by nonlinear interactions between different actors. For example, Yun et al [17] show that collaboration affect the innovation performance of an organization with a nonlinear u-shaped relation.…”

Section: Open Innovation and Complexity Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Open Innovation in Start-Ups’ Incubators: A Complexity Theory Perspective

Battistella

Toni

Pessot

2018

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, concepts and principles from the Complexity Theory (or, generally speaking, the complexity sciences) have been applied as a perspective for capturing the influence of the context, interaction, and adaption in the innovation processes, such as the ones enabled in the business incubators. The purpose of this paper is to implement a frame of reference for understanding the start-ups' incubator as a complex system where innovation, learning, and self-organization take place. We build on the interfaces between the Complexity Theory (i.e., complexity sciences) and Open Innovation literature to identify principles, patterns, and conditions that frame the incubation practices as simple rules aimed to sustain the innovation process towards the creation of new ventures. Results from the multiple case studies conducted in five incubators show that the features of variety, nonlinear interaction, interdependence, autonomy, and emergence of the incubation process framed as a complex system are enabled in different ways by the combination of the open innovation practices and services provided by the start-ups' incubators, including the provision of physical infrastructure, access to funding streams, experts/entrepreneurs networking, education/workshops, mentorship, and advice.

show abstract

Effect of Distance on Open Innovation: Differences among Institutions According to Patent Citation and Reference

Cited by 15 publications

References 42 publications

The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea

The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea

Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University

Framing Open Innovation in Start-Ups’ Incubators: A Complexity Theory Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About