Conference Proceedings. LEOS'98. 11th Annual Meeting. IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society 1998 Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH3
DOI: 10.1109/leos.1998.737886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dispersion on spectrum-sliced WDM systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, with a bit rate of 2.5Gbps, a FWHM slice width of 0.8nm, and no dispersion, the GA sensitivity prediction (-26.9dBm) differs by some 2dB compared with an extremely computationally intensive calculation based on the accurate pdfs (-28.9dBm) from Arya and Jacobs [12], whereas the SPA (-28.5dbm) is within 0.4dB. Moreover, the SPA has proved highly effective at obtaining agreement with measured results [13] and the results correspond well with those using a Fourier approach with chi square statistics [14]. In addition, measured results in [15] display power penalties of 1-2 dB consistent with the SPA results rather than the large penalties predicted by the GA. Figure 3 shows the optimum receiver sensitivity and its corresponding optical bandwidth as a function of the normalized distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, with a bit rate of 2.5Gbps, a FWHM slice width of 0.8nm, and no dispersion, the GA sensitivity prediction (-26.9dBm) differs by some 2dB compared with an extremely computationally intensive calculation based on the accurate pdfs (-28.9dBm) from Arya and Jacobs [12], whereas the SPA (-28.5dbm) is within 0.4dB. Moreover, the SPA has proved highly effective at obtaining agreement with measured results [13] and the results correspond well with those using a Fourier approach with chi square statistics [14]. In addition, measured results in [15] display power penalties of 1-2 dB consistent with the SPA results rather than the large penalties predicted by the GA. Figure 3 shows the optimum receiver sensitivity and its corresponding optical bandwidth as a function of the normalized distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In single mode fiber, the SS signal operating at a wavelength of 1550 nm suffers particularly from linear chromatic dispersion [14] …”
Section: Gaussian Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%