“…For example, with a bit rate of 2.5Gbps, a FWHM slice width of 0.8nm, and no dispersion, the GA sensitivity prediction (-26.9dBm) differs by some 2dB compared with an extremely computationally intensive calculation based on the accurate pdfs (-28.9dBm) from Arya and Jacobs [12], whereas the SPA (-28.5dbm) is within 0.4dB. Moreover, the SPA has proved highly effective at obtaining agreement with measured results [13] and the results correspond well with those using a Fourier approach with chi square statistics [14]. In addition, measured results in [15] display power penalties of 1-2 dB consistent with the SPA results rather than the large penalties predicted by the GA. Figure 3 shows the optimum receiver sensitivity and its corresponding optical bandwidth as a function of the normalized distance.…”