2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02502-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of disease duration on fecal biomarkers in ulcerative colitis: a prospective cohort study

Abstract: Background Biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal immunochemical occult blood tests (FIT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are used in clinical practice. In this study, the effect of UC disease duration on FC was investigated and compared to that on FIT. Methods One hundred twenty-eight colonoscopic examinations and two fecal biomarkers measurements were performed. The cases of UC were divided into short- and long-term disease-duration groups or categorized int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, fCAL is used as a proxy for intestinal inflammation in clinical practice and in clinical studies to monitor both IBD disease activity and treatment response [15][16][17][18]. Recent studies indicate that fCAL measured at baseline and up to 14 weeks after treatment with biologics had long-term prognostic value; however, fCAL levels were affected by duration of disease, making it less reliable as an inflammatory signal indicative of flare or disease activity [19,20]. Furthermore, fCAL is also elevated in patients with NAFLD and obesity, and therefore, fCAL is not necessarily reflective of gut specific inflammation or IBD flare [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, fCAL is used as a proxy for intestinal inflammation in clinical practice and in clinical studies to monitor both IBD disease activity and treatment response [15][16][17][18]. Recent studies indicate that fCAL measured at baseline and up to 14 weeks after treatment with biologics had long-term prognostic value; however, fCAL levels were affected by duration of disease, making it less reliable as an inflammatory signal indicative of flare or disease activity [19,20]. Furthermore, fCAL is also elevated in patients with NAFLD and obesity, and therefore, fCAL is not necessarily reflective of gut specific inflammation or IBD flare [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%