2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dilatation on scalar dissipation in turbulent premixed flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
192
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scalar gradient ∇c aligns with the most compressive principal strain rate when turbulent straining dominates over the strain rate arising from flame normal acceleration and vice versa [16,23,40]. The strengthening of turbulent straining and weakening of the strain rate induced by flame normal acceleration with increasing Karlovitz number are mimicked by the empirical Ka dependences in C * 3 and C * 4 respectively [14][15][16][19][20][21]. Any other functions, which account for the asymptotic behaviour of C * 3 and C * 4 in relation to Karlovitz number variation, can also be used in principle to parameterise these model parameters.…”
Section: Mathematical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scalar gradient ∇c aligns with the most compressive principal strain rate when turbulent straining dominates over the strain rate arising from flame normal acceleration and vice versa [16,23,40]. The strengthening of turbulent straining and weakening of the strain rate induced by flame normal acceleration with increasing Karlovitz number are mimicked by the empirical Ka dependences in C * 3 and C * 4 respectively [14][15][16][19][20][21]. Any other functions, which account for the asymptotic behaviour of C * 3 and C * 4 in relation to Karlovitz number variation, can also be used in principle to parameterise these model parameters.…”
Section: Mathematical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A number of analyses [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] concentrated on closures of SDR in turbulent premixed flames in the context of RANS but relatively limited effort [6][7][8] has been directed to the modelling of SDR for LES of turbulent premixed combustion. The combustion process takes place mostly at the sub-grid level in premixed flames, as the flame thickness often remains smaller than the filter size for most practical LES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cases D and E, respectively) are representative of hydrogen-blended methane-air mixtures and the Lewis number 1.2 [30]). Case A is taken from a well-known DNS database [31] which was used extensively in the past for the analysis of turbulent premixed combustion in the corrugated flamelets regime [10,27,32,33]. Cases B-L have been simulated using a well-known compressible DNS code called SENGA [34] which has been used successfully in a number of previous analyses [10][11][12][13][17][18][19][20]27], where the standard conservation equations of mass, momentum, species and energy have been solved in non-dimensional form.…”
Section: For Cases a B C D E F G And H-l Respectivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that Soret and Dufor effects are ignored here following several previous analyses on entropy generation in turbulent reacting flows [4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15]17]. Moreover, there have been several previous DNS based computational analyses [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], which ignored Dufor and Sorret effects without much loss of generality. These effects are not expected to play important roles in most hydrocarbon-air and hydrogen-air flames [35] unless extremely lean hydrogen-air flames are considered.…”
Section: Mathematical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single step chemistry has been used successfully to obtain fundamental physical insight and to develop high-fidelity models in several analyses in the past [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and the same methodology has been followed here. In the context of simplified chemistry the species field is characterized by a reaction progress variable c , which can be defined in terms of a suitable reactant mass fraction R Y as follows:…”
Section: Products Reactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%