2004
DOI: 10.1080/15459620490447956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Differing Facial Characteristics on Breathing Resistance Inside a Respirator Mask

Abstract: A group of subjects with a large range of facial characteristics was asked to breathe deeply while wearing a full facepiece respirator. The facial characteristics noted were head length, head depth, bizygomatic breadth, lip length, and Menton-Sellion length. External resistances to inhalation or exhalation were varied in each of the trials. The data collected were analyzed for possible correlation between facial characteristics and breathing resistance. Although respirator resistances were found to vary, no st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A resistance level of 3.5 cm H 2 O-sec/L is expected to result in a 30 % performance decrement. Because of this, one might expect performance with PAPR to be better than with air-purifying respirators, but this has yet to be definitively answered, and the extra weight of the blower and tubing may counteract at least some of the advantage of lower resistance [ 51 , 63 ].…”
Section: Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resistance level of 3.5 cm H 2 O-sec/L is expected to result in a 30 % performance decrement. Because of this, one might expect performance with PAPR to be better than with air-purifying respirators, but this has yet to be definitively answered, and the extra weight of the blower and tubing may counteract at least some of the advantage of lower resistance [ 51 , 63 ].…”
Section: Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han and Choi [6] showed that Africans and Americans have shallower and smaller noses compared to Caucasians by a length difference of approximately two mm. Rebar et al [7] in 2004, noticed that Caucasians can be distinguished by their long narrow faces for both males and females. Ballihi et al [8] extracted radial curves and several specific geometrical circulars using the AdaBoost algorithm for gender classification on the FRGCv2 dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDC reported that a mismatch between the FFR and the facial structure of healthcare workers resulted in a 6-88% failure rate in respirator fit and a 33% reduction in protective efficacy against infectious agents [12]. The type, model, and size of FFR fit differently according to facial dimensions, which can be influenced by gender, ethnicity, and age groups [13][14][15]. Facial dimensions, such as facial length and width, are some of the significant variables in a FFR's proper fit [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%