2011
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite

Abstract: The purpose of our study was to re-evaluate the effects of surface treatment on the bond strength of repaired methacrylate-based dental composite materials including nanofillers (Ceram X, Dentsply). The microtensile bond strengths were measured before or after thermo-mechanical fatigue simulation. The treatments were as follows: (1)No treatment (negative control), (2)Bonding agent, (3) Acetone, (4)Acetone+Bonding agent, (5)Silane, (6)Silane+Bonding agent. In the digitized SEM image of the polished aged specime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
37
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the differences between the groups with and without bonding agents were not significant, because Ceram X can be classified clinically as an easy-to-sculpt composite, and, on the other hand, this makes it easier to adapt it to the repair surface. In our previous study, it is reported that the application of Xeno V had nearly no additional benefit on the repair strength of Ceram X for the same reason 12) . Higher-filled or less sculptable composite materials such as Filtek Silorane might benefit more from the application of a bonding agent, as described in our precious study of the repair strength of Silorane 13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the differences between the groups with and without bonding agents were not significant, because Ceram X can be classified clinically as an easy-to-sculpt composite, and, on the other hand, this makes it easier to adapt it to the repair surface. In our previous study, it is reported that the application of Xeno V had nearly no additional benefit on the repair strength of Ceram X for the same reason 12) . Higher-filled or less sculptable composite materials such as Filtek Silorane might benefit more from the application of a bonding agent, as described in our precious study of the repair strength of Silorane 13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before fatigue simulation, all treatments of this study led to bonding between the silorane-based material and the methacrylate-based repair composite that is strong enough to be clinically useful, compared with the repair bond strength between the same composites under the same conditions in our previous studies for reference 12,13) . Thermocycling is a combination of hydrolytic degradation and thermal stresses and is a method to simulate temperature-related breakdown by repeated sudden temperature changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,23 The silane also enhances the wetting of the surface for the bonding agent, which is expected to infiltrate more easily through the irregularities created by the surface roughening. Previous researchers, 22,[24][25][26][27] who used silane primer in repairing methacrylate-based resin composite, proved that it had no significant effect in the repair bond strength. On the contrary, some researchers 5,10 confirmed the important role of silane primer when silorane-based resin composite was repaired with methacrylate-based adhesive/ repair composite but not with the silorane-based intermediate adhesive agent/repair composite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesion between two composite resin layers is achieved in the presence of an oxygen-inhibited layer of unpolymerized resin [7,16]. However, controversial opinions exist on the function of oxygeninhibited layer on the adhesion between two composite resin layers [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%