2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different river flow rates on biomarker responses in common carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the catchment area of LID, the flow-threshold range is 273-827 m 3 /s. Many studies have shown that damming and hydropower projects in the upper reaches of the lake will lead to a substantial reduction (more than 80%) or even drying up in some river sections, and flow-reduced river reaches downstream will be formed [61,62]. As a result, the downstream hydrological conditions have undergone significant alterations, resulting in serious degradation of the structure and function of the river ecosystem [63,64].…”
Section: Quantitative Response Relationship Between P−ibi Index and Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the catchment area of LID, the flow-threshold range is 273-827 m 3 /s. Many studies have shown that damming and hydropower projects in the upper reaches of the lake will lead to a substantial reduction (more than 80%) or even drying up in some river sections, and flow-reduced river reaches downstream will be formed [61,62]. As a result, the downstream hydrological conditions have undergone significant alterations, resulting in serious degradation of the structure and function of the river ecosystem [63,64].…”
Section: Quantitative Response Relationship Between P−ibi Index and Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%