2016
DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2016.1255159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different parameters on grinding efficiency and its monitoring by acoustic emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, the mechanical shocks become increasingly intensified due to impacts of the process which are originated by the couplings and uncouplings between the workpiece and grinding wheel. This will lead to fracture of bond and grits and, consequently, loss of grits cutting edges, thereby reducing cutting performance and adversely affecting surface finish [8,21]. In this current work, it was expected that the increase in number of grooves lead to more bond-grits fracture, but by the surface roughness and standard deviation values obtained, no influence of number of grooves was observed in the surface roughness.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this sense, the mechanical shocks become increasingly intensified due to impacts of the process which are originated by the couplings and uncouplings between the workpiece and grinding wheel. This will lead to fracture of bond and grits and, consequently, loss of grits cutting edges, thereby reducing cutting performance and adversely affecting surface finish [8,21]. In this current work, it was expected that the increase in number of grooves lead to more bond-grits fracture, but by the surface roughness and standard deviation values obtained, no influence of number of grooves was observed in the surface roughness.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As the grinding depth increases, the area of pile of material is increased due to excessive plowing action at higher grinding depths. 20 Figure 5(c) presents the effect of grinding depth on chip formation force under different grinding wheels. The number of active grits is increased at higher grinding depth and thereby increases the chip formation force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this stage, the grit shears the material and facilitates the cutting action. 20 From the above discussion, the rubbing and plowing action does not support the material removal and increases the cutting force. The actual material removal is carried out by the cutting action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By the fact that the MQL + WCJ technique resulted in lower roughness results, irrespective of the flow rate tested, in relation to those obtained for the traditional MQL technique, it can be inferred that a combination of flow rate, aluminum oxide grinding wheel, and compressed air wheel cleaning jet helped in promoting better evacuation of chips from the contact zone [20], thereby preventing the occurrence of wheel clogging. In addition, since the material removal mechanism in grinding occurs at a micro scale and consists of three phases (rubbing, plowing and cutting), rubbing and plowing stages are highly inefficient in terms of material removal [1,21], thus only on the cutting phase in fact chip formation takes place. In these phases, high amount of energy is spent in deformation and friction on the surface being machined which is converted to heat within the grinding zone [22].…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%