2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Organic Manures on Yield and Quality of Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest fresh weight (40.07 g) was found from the V 3 (14 t ha -1 treatment where the lowest fresh (22.07 g) was found from the V 0 (control) treatment which was significantly different from all other treatments. Similar result Dhaker et al [23] which supported the present study. Fresh weight bulb -1 was affected significantly by earthing up of onion (Table 4).…”
Section: E0 E1 E2supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest fresh weight (40.07 g) was found from the V 3 (14 t ha -1 treatment where the lowest fresh (22.07 g) was found from the V 0 (control) treatment which was significantly different from all other treatments. Similar result Dhaker et al [23] which supported the present study. Fresh weight bulb -1 was affected significantly by earthing up of onion (Table 4).…”
Section: E0 E1 E2supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Combined effect of vermicompost and earthing up of onion was significantly influenced by yield plot -1 (Table 5). The result obtained from the present study was similar with the findings of Dhaker et al [23]. The highest yield plot -1 (567.33 g) was found from the V 3 E 2 (treatment combination), which was significantly different from all other treatment combinations followed by V 3 E 1 and V 3 E 0 .…”
Section: Yield Plot -1 (G)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, it due to higher yield and dry matter accumulation, the crop removed larger quantities of nutrients (NPK) from soils and improved quality parameters. The results are in close harmony to the findings of (Damse et al, 2014;Dhaker et al, 2017 andSingh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Chemical Content and Quality Of Garlic:  N P And K Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The higher yield in 2016 was most likely due to the increase in bulb weight and the number of leaves in that year. Similar results had been reported by Dhaker et al (2017) and by Shinde and Shinde (2016). One of the possible reasons for higher yields in 2016 may have also been the earlier time of transplanting into the field (6 days earlier than in 2017).…”
Section: Marketable and Total Yieldsupporting
confidence: 91%