2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different initial low pH conditions on biogas production, composition, and shift in the aceticlastic methanogenic population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more negative Δ G Overall value in this scenario indicates a potential increase in the driving force to carry out the syntrophic reaction. Nonetheless, this might be compromised by physiological limitations and enhanced toxicity effects 37 observed at decreased pH levels, particularly in the case of methanogenic populations. 38 In consequence, bioenergetics does not suffice to elucidate the detrimental effects observed on the syntrophic conversions if pH is considered as the main explanatory variable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more negative Δ G Overall value in this scenario indicates a potential increase in the driving force to carry out the syntrophic reaction. Nonetheless, this might be compromised by physiological limitations and enhanced toxicity effects 37 observed at decreased pH levels, particularly in the case of methanogenic populations. 38 In consequence, bioenergetics does not suffice to elucidate the detrimental effects observed on the syntrophic conversions if pH is considered as the main explanatory variable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, raw biogas is composed of CH 4 (60–70%), CO 2 (30–40%), H 2 O (5–10%), and, depending on the biomass matrix, trace amounts of other species such as H 2 S (0.15–3%), NH 3 (<1%), CO (<0.6%), siloxanes, carbonyls, terpenes, and aromatic or halogenated compounds. Biogas upgrading for increasing its calorific value involves specific steps, starting with H 2 O condensation, desulfurization (e.g., removal of toxic and corrosive H 2 S), and CO 2 sequestration based on different universally established and commonly used technologies including physisorption and/or chemisorption, membrane or cryogenic separation, and by chemical or biological treatment. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the archaeal sequences, representatives were found for the genera Methanosaeta and Methanobacterium respectively fof the phyla of the Halobacterota and Euryarchaeota phyla in the starter, which have already been related to other processes of anaerobic digestion and biogas production. Representatives of the Methanosaeta genus maintained their dominance over other methanogenic groups in a study where acetoclastic methanogen groups able to act at low pH were acclimated to replace the use of NaOH to regulate buffer pH, a procedure that can inhibit methanogenic microorganisms (Ali et al 2019). The acetoclastic methanogenic genus Methanosaeta has also been observed in other studies to improve biogas production (Zamorano et al 2020; Chen et al 2017).…”
Section: Metabarcoding Analyzesmentioning
confidence: 99%