2016
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Firing Temperatures on Structural Changes in Porcelain

Abstract: All the above findings validate the objective of studying the physical and internal structural changes of dental porcelain when subjected to an increasing firing temperature gradient. The specimens fired at 900°C exhibited superior strength and abrasion resistance. SEM analysis depicted a homogeneous mass of dental porcelain, implying that firing was complete at 900°C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Tripathi et al, the firing temperature has a certain influence on ceramic structures, with the increasing firing temperature gradient being of the utmost importance. Their findings indicate that a higher firing temperature results in a surface characterized by less significant porosities, as shown by there being fewer peaks obtained by the XRD graphs [50]. This conclusion is in accordance with our results; the 4_P2_C sample, fired at higher temperatures, exhibited a smoother and more homogeneous surface texture, compared to the 4_P1_sample, as shown in the SEM images (Table 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Tripathi et al, the firing temperature has a certain influence on ceramic structures, with the increasing firing temperature gradient being of the utmost importance. Their findings indicate that a higher firing temperature results in a surface characterized by less significant porosities, as shown by there being fewer peaks obtained by the XRD graphs [50]. This conclusion is in accordance with our results; the 4_P2_C sample, fired at higher temperatures, exhibited a smoother and more homogeneous surface texture, compared to the 4_P1_sample, as shown in the SEM images (Table 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%