Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

Bähr, Nora; Keul, Christine; Edelhoff, Daniel; Eichberger, Marlis; Roos, Małgorzata; Gernet, Wolfgang; Stawarczyk, Bogna

doi:10.4012/dmj.2012-329

Cited by 77 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stawarczyk et al [21] showed that the bond strength between air-abraded PMMA-based polymer and a hybrid composite was not further increased by adhesive conditioning. In contrast, another study demonstrated that without further conditioning no adhesion between air-abraded CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements could be achieved [19,21].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE The study aimed to analyse the shear bond strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-and compositebased polymer materials repaired with a conventional methacrylate-based composite after different surface pretreatments. METHODS Each 48 specimens was prepared from six different CAD/CAM polymer materials (Ambarino high-class, artBloc Temp, CAD-Temp, Lava Ultimate, Telio CAD, Everest C-Temp) and a conventional dimethacrylate-based composite (Filtek Supreme XTE, control) and aged by thermal cycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C). The surfaces were left untreated or were pretreated by mechanical roughening, aluminium oxide air abrasion or silica coating/silanization (each subgroup n = 12). The surfaces were further conditioned with an etchrinse adhesive (OptiBond FL) before the repair composite (Filtek Supreme XTE) was adhered to the surface. After further thermal cycling, shear bond strength was tested, and failure modes were assessed. Shear bond strength was statistically analysed by twoand one-way ANOVAs and Weibull statistics, failure mode by chi(2) test (p 0.05). RESULTS Shear bond strength was highest for silica coating/silanization > aluminium oxide air abrasion = mechanical roughening > no surface pretreatment. Independently of the repair pretreatment, highest bond strength values were observed in the control group and for the composite-based Everest C-Temp and Ambarino high-class, while PMMA-based materials (artBloc Temp, CAD-Temp and Telio CAD) presented significantly lowest values. For all materials, repair without any surface pretreatment resulted in adhesive failures only, which mostly were reduced when surface pretreatment was performed. CONCLUSIONS Repair of CAD/CAM high-density polymers requires surface pretreatment prior to adhesive and composite application. However, four out of six of the tested CAD/CAM materials did not achieve the repair bond strength of a conventional dimethacrylate-based composite. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Repair of PMMA-and composite-based polymers can be achieved by surface pretreatment followed by application of an adhesive and a conventional methacrylate-based composite. Conclusions: Repair of CAD/CAM high-density polymers requires surface pretreatment prior to adhesive and composite application. However, four out of six of the tested CAD/CAM materials did not achieve the repair bond strength of a conventional dimethacrylate-based composite.Clinical Relevance: Repair of PMMA-and composite-based polymers can be achieved by surface pretreatment followed by application of an adhesive and a conventional methacrylate-based composite.2

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Moreover, thermocycling might lead to mechanical stress on the bonding area of the repaired substrate. However, it is also discussed that thermocycling might increase the repair bond strength by intensifying the process of post-polymerisation between polymeric CAD/CAM materials and adhesive resins [19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The various hybrid ceramics produced by different companies all exhibit unique features, since each material has a different composition of ceramic and resin matrix, and the bonding protocol may differ. Bahr et al 7) reported that because the CAD-CAM composite block polymerized in an industrial environment has a very high polymerization rate, inappropriate surface pretreatment will result in a very low bonding strength.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of air-particle pressures on the surface topography and bond strengths of resin cement to the hybrid ceramics

Kim

Shim

et al. 2017

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the appropriate pressure for airborne-abrasion by comparing the shear bond strength values for different hybrid ceramic surfaces. Two materials were used to produce hybrid ceramic specimens: Lava Ultimate and MAZIC Duro. The group of specimens whose surfaces were not subjected to airborne-abrasion was set as the control group. In the experimental group, airborne-abrasion was performed at pressures of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa. After the adhesive and resin cement was applied, an SBS test was performed. For the MAZIC Duro block, the SBS increased monotonically with the airborne-abrasion pressure increased, peaking at 0.3 MPa. For the Lava Ultimate block, the SBS increased as the airborne-abrasion pressure increased to 0.2 MPa, and then decreased in the 0.3-MPa group, thereby peaking at 0.2 MPa. This study has confirmed that the bonding strength varies with the material used even when applying the same surface treatment.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that with surface pretreatment by airborne-particle abrasion and adhesive system application, the achievement of adequate bond strength to other methacrylates is possible. [9][10][11][12] Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), in contrast, represents a methacrylate-free, high-performance thermoplastic polymer consisting of aromatic benzene molecules, which are connected alternately by functional ether or ketone groups. 13 It shows good dimensional stability 14 and is radiolucent, making it compatible with imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and xray.…”

Section: Clinical Implications Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins

Stawarczyk

Jordan

Schmidlin

et al. 2014

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Self Cite

167

176

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) can be used as a framework material for fixed dental prostheses. However, information about the durable bond to veneering resins is still scarce. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of chemical treatments of PEEK on tensile bond strength (TBS) to veneering resins with special emphasis on surface free energy (SFE) and surface roughness (SR). MATERIAL AND METHODS Seven-hundred fifty PEEK specimens were fabricated and divided into the following 3 pretreatment groups (n=250/group): etching with sulfuric acid for 60 seconds, etching with piranha acid for 30 seconds, and an unetched control. After pretreatment, SFE was determined by using contact angle measurements and SR with a profilometer (n=10/group). The topography of pretreated PEEK surfaces was examined with scanning electron microscopy. Remaining specimens (n=240 per group) were conditioned with visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond, or were left untreated as the control group. Half of each group was veneered with Sinfony or VITA VM LC (n=40/group), and TBS was measured after storage in distilled water at 37°C for either 24 hours or 60 days. Data were analyzed by 4-way and 1-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffé post hoc test and chi-square test (=.05). RESULTS PEEK specimens etched with sulfuric acid resulted in higher SFE and SR than specimens without pretreatment or etching with piranha acid. Etching with sulfuric acid or piranha acid led to no general recommendations with respect to TBS. Conditioning with visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond significantly increased the TBS (P<.001). PEEK veneered with Sinfony showed significantly higher TBS values than those veneered with VITA VM LC (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Sufficient TBS for bonding to veneering resin can only be achieved when additional adhesive materials were applied. ABSTRACTStatement of the problem. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) can be used to support fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). However, information about the durable bond to veneering resins is still scarce.Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of chemical treatments of PEEK on tensile bond strength (TBS) to veneering resins with special emphasis on surface free energy (SFE) and surface roughness (SR). Materials and methods.Seven-hundred-fifty PEEK specimens were fabricated and divided into the following 3 pretreatment groups (n=250/group): etching with sulfuric acid for 60 seconds, piranha acid for 30 seconds, and an unetched control. After pretreatment, SFE was determined by using contact angle measurements and SR with a profilometer (n=10/group).

show abstract

Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

Cited by 77 publications

References 31 publications

Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers

Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers

Effect of air-particle pressures on the surface topography and bond strengths of resin cement to the hybrid ceramics

PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About