2019
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis DSM29784 on hen performance, egg quality indices, and apparent retention of dietary components in laying hens from 19 to 48 weeks of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that egg production is positively correlated with energy supply [7,8]; thus, it is possible that layers of the HP group could utilize more energy for egg production, instead of body weight maintenance. In addition, previous studies have shown that egg production is negatively correlated with egg weight [9,10], the eggshell thickness is positively correlated with strength [11], and similar results were observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is well known that egg production is positively correlated with energy supply [7,8]; thus, it is possible that layers of the HP group could utilize more energy for egg production, instead of body weight maintenance. In addition, previous studies have shown that egg production is negatively correlated with egg weight [9,10], the eggshell thickness is positively correlated with strength [11], and similar results were observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…B. subtilis DSM29784 resulted in a significant increase in nutrient retentions and dietary AME n in laying hens throughout the production cycle, where a total of 336 Shaver White layers were studied from 19 to 48 weeks of age [ 49 ]. Among the three inclusion levels (low, medium, and high), a high inclusion level of the bacteria increased the apparent retention of common nutrients, such as dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), gross energy (GE), calcium, and total phosphorus, but the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and AMEn were highest for the medium level of inclusion.…”
Section: Nutrient Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of B. subtilis probiotic enhanced the overall feed efficiency, egg weight, and egg mass. Neijat et al [ 49 ] also showed that the inclusion of B. subtilis improved the albumen height and Haught unit of the eggs throughout the production cycle from 19 to 48 weeks of age. The lowest shell breaking strength found at week 20 was a drawback of the high supplementation of the probiotic.…”
Section: Laying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many yeast species are recognized safe by many regulatory authorities such as Qualified Presumption of Safety status assigned by the European Food Safety Authority, the Association of American Feed Control Officials and Canadian Food Inspection Agency. However, in general, most commercial probiotic feed additives for poultry are of bacterial preparations e.g., (49)(50)(51)(52)(53). The few non-bacterial (yeast or fungal) probiotics includes Aspergillus oryzae (54,55), Candida pintolopesii (54), Candida saitoana, Saccharomyces bourlardii (56), and S. cerevisiae (57).…”
Section: Live Whole Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%