1971
DOI: 10.2527/jas1971.3261128x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dietary Protein Level on Composition Changes in Sow Colostrum and Milk2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
33
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Dourmad et al in primiparous lactating sows when dietary crude protein (CP) level was reduced from 17.1 to 15.5% without change in lysine concentration (0.77%) [7]. For a more severe restriction of dietary CP (15 to 5% and 23.8 to 6.3%, respectively), Elliott et al and King et al showed reduced fat and protein milk contents in low CP treatment [20,21]. In these latter studies, the milk AA composition expressed as a proportion of nitrogen content was slightly affected by protein supply.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were reported by Dourmad et al in primiparous lactating sows when dietary crude protein (CP) level was reduced from 17.1 to 15.5% without change in lysine concentration (0.77%) [7]. For a more severe restriction of dietary CP (15 to 5% and 23.8 to 6.3%, respectively), Elliott et al and King et al showed reduced fat and protein milk contents in low CP treatment [20,21]. In these latter studies, the milk AA composition expressed as a proportion of nitrogen content was slightly affected by protein supply.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…From these results, it can be suggested that changes in AA pattern during lactation could be explained by the presence to some extent of immune proteins in mature milk produced after the colostrum stage. On average lysine milk content concentration was not affected by stage of lactation (P>0.05) and averaged 7.24 g/ 16 g N; this value is rather similar to the levels reported by Elliott et al, King et al, and Dourmad et al (7.30, 6.95, and 7.39 g lysine / 16 g N, respectively) [7,20,21].…”
Section: Citationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The energy concentration of the milk has also been reported to vary very little during lactation (Pomar et al, 1991), although Noblet and Etienne (1986) detected a slight reduction after the fifth day of lactation. The average total content of the 15 considered amino acids of sow milk (78.9 g/100 g protein) was lower than those found by Elliot et al (1971), Duée and Jung (1973) and Dourmad et al (1991) (89.4, 92.1 and 90.6 g/100g protein, respectively), but was similar to that reported by King et al (1993a) (83.8 g/100g protein) and higher than that observed by Davis et al (1994) (35 g l -1 of milk including proline and cystine). In our experiment the lysine average content of sow milk was 6.56 g/100g protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In our experiment the lysine average content of sow milk was 6.56 g/100g protein. Higher values of lysine were found by Elliot et al (1971), Duée and Jung (1973), Dourmad et al (1991) and King et al (1993a) (7.1, 7.59, 7.24 and 6.95 g/100 g milk protein, respectively). However, the concentration of the other amino acids studied, when expressed as a proportion of lysine content, were similar to those attained by the same authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation