2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of diet and packaging system on the microbial status, pH, color and sensory traits of rabbit meat evaluated during chilled storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
32
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean pH was 5.9 ± 0.1 for both groups at all times ( p = 0.710). Therefore, no significant effect was found, in accordance with what was previously reported by Menchetti et al and Cullere et al [ 22 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean pH was 5.9 ± 0.1 for both groups at all times ( p = 0.710). Therefore, no significant effect was found, in accordance with what was previously reported by Menchetti et al and Cullere et al [ 22 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results in part overlap with what was reported by Smeti et al and Nieto et al [ 33 , 34 ], who observed a decrease in L* values and an increase with a subsequent decrease in a* values during refrigerated storage of lamb and ewe meat. Conversely, Cullere et al [ 24 ] found no variation during shelf life in L*, a*, and b* coordinates on rabbit meat, regardless of the type of diet and packaging. In the current work, b* values showed a fluctuating trend in both groups as it decreased after four days (from 0.76 ± 0.14 at day 0 to −0.02 ± 0.14 at day 4; p < 0.001) and increased in the last observation (1.25 ± 0.14; p = 0.014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar proteins content was also reported in other articles for rabbit meat of average sized breeds [1, 17-20, 25-36, 40-43]. The proteins level varies relatedly to the carcass part, between 18.6 g/100 g in forelegs and 22.4 g/100 g in LD muscles [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]48]. The proportion of water and protein is higher in younger rabbits, and the amount of lipids is lower [29,35,40].…”
Section: Experimental Part Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It is rich in protein (18.6-22.4 g/100 g) with high biological value through the essential amino acid content, low in fat (1.8-8.8 g/100 g), cholesterol (47-61 mg/100 g), Na (37-47 mg/100 g). It is also recommended in hypertensive people diets [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], as well as in people affected by gout, due to the low purine content and the lack of uric acid [53]. It is rich in K (428-431 mg/100 g), P (222-237 mg/100 g), Mg (27 mg/100 g), Fe (5.56 mg/15.0 g/100 g), B complex vitamins and has a favorable high unsaturated fatty acids profile, with high ω6/ω3 ratio [24-36, 52, 62, 64-66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%