2019
DOI: 10.14359/51713308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Development and Geometry on Behavior of Concrete Deep Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Introducing large web openings in the deep beam transforms it into an ordinary beam-column (Figure 2 • The load-deflection curve behaves semi-linearly, which shows that the deep beams act as ordinary beams more than as deep beams, as a result of the large web openings at the shear zone which change their geometry (Figure 3) [17].…”
Section: B Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Introducing large web openings in the deep beam transforms it into an ordinary beam-column (Figure 2 • The load-deflection curve behaves semi-linearly, which shows that the deep beams act as ordinary beams more than as deep beams, as a result of the large web openings at the shear zone which change their geometry (Figure 3) [17].…”
Section: B Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study findings showed that the beams with the smallest strain energy predicted by the STM demonstrated lower crack widths and exhibited the best performance. Rezaei et al [11] carried out numerical and experimental research on the impact of the strut angle, development length, shape, and overhang length on the conduct of statically determinate concrete members with disturbed regions. Thirty-five simple deep beam specimens were tested and numerically modeled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete Deep Beams" (submitted to ACI Structural Journal ) [11]: The second paper is an extension of the first paper, including additional experimental results for one additional experimental specimens, the validation of numerical models, and results for numerical modeling of an additional 35 specimens. The specimens were modeled to investigate the effect of development length, development type, strut type, and strut angle on the behavior of nodal zones in discontinuity regions.…”
Section: • Chapter 5 -"Effect Of Development and Beam Geometry On Behmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting compressive stress of the node face (fcu) depends on the type of node (CCC, CCT, or CTT), the face where the nominal resistance is being found (bearing face, back face, or strut-to-node interface), the compressive strength of the concrete (f'c), and any confinement effects from surrounding concrete (accounted for through m), as shown in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Note that unlike ACI 318-14, AASHTO LRFD [19] does not account for the effect of stresses being able to spread along the length of struts or not being able to in members with constant cross-sectional areas along the length of struts.…”
Section: Aashto Lrfd Bridge Design Specification [19]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation