2015
DOI: 10.1111/jog.12683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy on risk of obstetric interventions

Abstract: The present findings support an association between depressive symptoms and adverse obstetric outcomes and suggest that anxiety and depression may have different effects on obstetric outcomes. Understanding the mechanism in which depression increases the risk of emergency cesarean birth needs further research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(94 reference statements)
4
44
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Depression in mothers before and after childbirth is a major public health concern, with consequences on pregnancy outcome , mother affective status , and child behavioral and emotional development . The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) is estimated at around 10–20% and well‐established risk factors include presence of antepartum depression, psychiatric history, low self‐esteem, stressful life events and lack of social support .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depression in mothers before and after childbirth is a major public health concern, with consequences on pregnancy outcome , mother affective status , and child behavioral and emotional development . The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) is estimated at around 10–20% and well‐established risk factors include presence of antepartum depression, psychiatric history, low self‐esteem, stressful life events and lack of social support .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following maternal and neonatal characteristics were included as independent variables or potential confounders [ 29 , 30 , 32 , 46 49 ]: parity (nulliparous, multiparous); care setting at the onset of labour (midwife-led, obstetrician-led), maternal age (< 20, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, ≥40 years); ethnic background (Dutch, non-Dutch); degree of urbanisation (urban, intermediate, rural); socioeconomic status (high, medium, low); gestational age (37 + 0–37 + 6, 38 + 0–40 + 6, 41 + 0–41 + 6, ≥42 weeks); and birth weight (< 2.3rd, <10th, >90th, > 97.7th percentile). Ethnic background was reported by the care provider and was defined as Dutch or non-Dutch, because of inconsistencies in recording non-Dutch subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All non-pregnant women and pregnant women were assessed using a structured interview, including the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Thai validated translation (Pitanupong et al 2007;Vacharaporn et al 2003) and Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), state version in a Thai validated translation (Spielberger and Vagg 1984;Thapinta 1991) Pregnant women with an EPDS score ≥ 11 were diagnosed as suffering from depression, either antenatal (T1) or postpartum (T2) (Pitanupong et al 2007;Vacharaporn et al 2003). The STAI had been used to assess anxiety among pregnant women (Abedian et al 2015;Bayrampour et al 2015). In nonpregnant women and pregnant women at T1 we used the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) -Thai version (Kittirattanapaiboon and Khamwongpin 2005)to assess the diagnosis of Ba life time history of mood disorders^(namely major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or dysthymia) and Ba life time history of depression^(namely major depressive disorder or dysthymia).…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%