2006
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-66432006000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Density and Flower Size on the Reproductive Success of Nothoscordum Graminum (Alliaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e fact that fruiting success increases with the increasing availability of fl owers and that the eff ect is greater when fl oral density is low shows that the relationship is not linear. Montenegro & Cavieres (2006) also suggested that there is a nonlinear relationship between fl oral density and fruiting success, possibly due to intraspecifi c (interindividual) competition among pollinators in settings of high fl oral density (Feldman et al 2004). Although elevated fl oral densities lead to a higher number of pollinator visits, this increase is not necessarily proportional to the increase in the number of fl owers (Klinkhamer et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Th e fact that fruiting success increases with the increasing availability of fl owers and that the eff ect is greater when fl oral density is low shows that the relationship is not linear. Montenegro & Cavieres (2006) also suggested that there is a nonlinear relationship between fl oral density and fruiting success, possibly due to intraspecifi c (interindividual) competition among pollinators in settings of high fl oral density (Feldman et al 2004). Although elevated fl oral densities lead to a higher number of pollinator visits, this increase is not necessarily proportional to the increase in the number of fl owers (Klinkhamer et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). In addition, the high fruit set following the brief fl owering period might have occurred due to the high density of fl owering individuals, which formed clusters within the forest (Montenegro & Cavieres 2006) and attracted more pollinators. In general, plants located in areas with abundant fl oral resources are more frequently visited and have superior fruiting success (Feinsinger et al 1991;Th ompson 2001, Klinkhamer & van der Lugt 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fruit trees, such as peach (P. persica), pomegranate (Punica granatum) and rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei), fruit set was significantly higher from larger flowers than smaller ones (Scorza et al, 1991;Johnson et al, 2011;Wetzstein et al, 2013). In addition, pollinators generally minimize energy expenditure and tend to visit bloom where the distance between flowers is short (Molina- Montenegro and Cavieres, 2006). Therefore, flower densities influence the crop yield in most fruit species (Stover, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pollinators tend to visit flowers with the traits (e.g., size, form and color) that imply maximum rewards (Klinkhamer and Van der Lugt, 2004). Flower size is generally considered the most important attribute for pollinators and flowers with large perianth usually attract more pollinators, partially because of the positive correlation between the petal size and nectar rewards (Cohen and Shmida, 1993;Molina-Montenegro and Cavieres, 2006). In fruit trees, such as peach (P. persica), pomegranate (Punica granatum) and rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei), fruit set was significantly higher from larger flowers than smaller ones (Scorza et al, 1991;Johnson et al, 2011;Wetzstein et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large floral organ display is associated with a higher capability to attract pollinators (Young and Stanton, 1990;Kudoh and Wigham, 1998;Thompson, 2001;Nattero et al, 2010). Flowers with large perianths often attract more pollinators, partly because of the higher nectar rewards, and the petal size is positive correlated with this behavior (Molina-Montenegro and Cavieres, 2006). Therefore, pollinators tend to visit larger flowers rather than the smaller ones both in the same and between different plant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%