1954
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1954.tb00856.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Denervation on Enzymes in Iris and Blood Vessels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravenously injected physostigmine did not potentiate the responses to adrenaline in the two experiments in which adrenaline was administered to atropinized cats. This result confirms that reported previously by Burn et al (1954).…”
Section: Sec Atropinesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intravenously injected physostigmine did not potentiate the responses to adrenaline in the two experiments in which adrenaline was administered to atropinized cats. This result confirms that reported previously by Burn et al (1954).…”
Section: Sec Atropinesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…They too were slightly depressed in height but were unaltered in duration. Previous workers (Secker, 1937;Burn, Philpot & Trendelenburg, 1954) have reported that physostigmine may potentiate the response of the membrane to adrenaline. Out of a total of nine experiments in which responses to adrenaline were studied, slight potentiation (about 12%) was observed only twice and this was in the two experiments in which physostigmine (200 pg/kg) was injected intravenously.…”
Section: Effect Of Physostigmine Ard Atropinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated by Burn, then later by Cervoni et al (Burn, Philpot, Trendelenburg, 1954;Cervoni, West, Pink, 1956), that physostigmine potentiated the contracting effect of adrenaline on the nictitating membrane of the cat, and at the same time the pressor effect of adrenaline decreased. The authors have suggested that the effect of physostigmine is being independent of the trans mission of the adrenergic impulses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the limitations of the method used, this suggestion is hardly sufficient to make major changes in our present well established views on constrictor fiber control of the effector cells. Mono amine oxidase is very widespread in the tissues and is not found only in connection with adrenergic neuroeffector units (259); sympathetic degenera tion does not significantly lower its concentration in vascular walls (62). It does not seem to be of dominant importance for the destruction at least of circulating catechols (145,147).…”
Section: Nervous Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%