2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of deformation mode and grain orientation on misorientation development in a body-centered cubic steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computed and experimental results confirmed that the average grain rotation and refinement were much more intensive for simple shear during ECAE than for pure shear during rolling. Mishra et al [34] and Kang et al [35] obtained similar results.…”
Section: Rigid Rotationsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computed and experimental results confirmed that the average grain rotation and refinement were much more intensive for simple shear during ECAE than for pure shear during rolling. Mishra et al [34] and Kang et al [35] obtained similar results.…”
Section: Rigid Rotationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In both cases the texture strengths of the UFG material were lower than those of its coarse-grained counterparts but it remained much stronger for pure shear than for simple shear. Kang et al (2007) also observed weakening of the texture strength and enhanced structure refinement due to shear deformation.…”
Section: Texturesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the evolution rate of the LAB fraction within one phase may depend, in a complex way, on three main parameters. The first of these is the initial LAB fraction, which is higher in the alpha phase; the second is the level of deformation, assumed to be higher in the gamma phase; and the third is the degree of stability of the subgrains created during deformation, since, owing to deformation, initially close subgrains can reorient very differently, further increasing the misorientation between them [27,28]. As a consequence of these various influences, this LAB fraction first increases faster in the gamma phase, and then still more rapidly in the alpha phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the mismatch between α-Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 are often considered to be responsible for various peculiar features of plastic flow [46]. However, previous study [29,44] reveals that intragranular plastic strain heterogeneity have revealed plastic strains as large as 5 times the macroscopic tensile strain. Large local strains were found to be statistically linked to proximity to grain boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tolerance value for the judgment of grain interior is generally equal to 5°. Generally, the predetermined tolerance angle is between 3 and 12.5° [29]. The tolerance angle of 5° here was chosen in order to avoid the overlapping of the grain groups in this case, which could be derived from the propagation of some cracks beyond the initiating grains [30].…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%