Effect of deep injection on field-scale emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin from bare soil

Yates, Scott R.; Ashworth, Daniel J.; Zheng, Wei; Knuteson, J. A.; Wesenbeeck, I. J. van

doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.042

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Modeled cumulative volatilization after 14 days was 24.5% of 66.5 kg/ha application of cis-1,3-D. Previous field studies near Buttonwillow, CA ( Yates et al , 2008 , 2015 , 2016 ) found 16-35% cumulative flux of bare soil 1,3-D application. van Wesenbeeck et al (2007) measured 1,3-D flux of 26.5% at a field site near Douglas, GA. Brown et al (2019) simulated 10 to 58% volatilization losses of 1,3-D for 17 different application methods using HYDRUS model.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 85%

Modeling volatilization emissions of soil-applied pesticides under agricultural field conditions

Ghosh

Crist

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 85%

Modeling volatilization emissions of soil-applied pesticides under agricultural field conditions

Ghosh

Crist

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…AERMOD replaced ISCST3 by USEPA, although ISCST3 is still in use by some researchers and regulatory authorities. ISCST3 has been widely used to simulate probability distribution functions (PDFs) of fumigant concentrations in air within townships in California to estimate acute and chronic bystander exposure [15,16].…”

Section: Air Dispersion Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prediction of Agricultural Contaminant Concentrations in Ambient Air

Cryer¹,

Wesenbeeck²

2020

Atmospheric Air Pollution and Monitoring

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring ambient air to assess environmental exposure and risk for volatile agricultural chemicals requires extensive resources and logistical effort. The cost and technical limitations of monitoring can be mitigated using a validated air dispersion model to simulate concentrations of volatile organic chemicals in ambient air. The SOil Fumigant Exposure Assessment (SOFEA) model was developed to explore volatile pesticide exposure and bystander risk. SOFEA assembles sources and source strengths, uses weather data from the region of interest, and executes an air dispersion model (AERMOD, ISCST3) to simulate pesticide concentrations at user defined receptors that can be used in exposure and risk assessment. This work highlights SOFEA development from inception and modifications over the last 1.5 decades, to the current delivery within the public domain. Various examples for the soil fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene are provided.

show abstract

Replicated flux measurements of 1,3-dichloropropene emissions from a bare soil under field conditions

Ashworth

Yates

Anderson

et al. 2018

Atmospheric Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of deep injection on field-scale emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin from bare soil

Abstract: Atmospheric emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin can be reduced by deep injection into soil.

Cited by 9 publications

References 38 publications

Modeling volatilization emissions of soil-applied pesticides under agricultural field conditions

Modeling volatilization emissions of soil-applied pesticides under agricultural field conditions

Prediction of Agricultural Contaminant Concentrations in Ambient Air

Replicated flux measurements of 1,3-dichloropropene emissions from a bare soil under field conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About