2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of DC current on tensile creep of pure tin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is unsurprising that the reported elastic modulus (E) ranges from 1.84 to 7.8 GPa, and the yield strength from 0.48 to 1.10 MPa [9][10][11]. Similar to other soft metals and alloys, such as Sn-alloys [12,13], indium [14] and lead [15], the deformation behavior of Li exhibits low yield strength and viscoplasticity. Because of the importance of viscoplastic behavior, we report, in this letter, nanoindentation measurements of Li performed in an argon-fill glove box.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is unsurprising that the reported elastic modulus (E) ranges from 1.84 to 7.8 GPa, and the yield strength from 0.48 to 1.10 MPa [9][10][11]. Similar to other soft metals and alloys, such as Sn-alloys [12,13], indium [14] and lead [15], the deformation behavior of Li exhibits low yield strength and viscoplasticity. Because of the importance of viscoplastic behavior, we report, in this letter, nanoindentation measurements of Li performed in an argon-fill glove box.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their experiments, they observed huge creep deformation at room temperature and creep stress exponent close to 1 which indicates atomic diffusion governs the overall creep process. This is unlike bulk Sn which observes dislocation climb with a typical stress exponent of ~3-7 and creep activation energy close to atomic self-diffusion[40,41]. Further evaluation with in-situ SEM creep tests confirmed it was due to lattice diffusion rather than coble creep that resulted in the behavior of the tin nanopillars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Nah J. W. et al [4] and Ren F. et al [5] observed ductile to brittle transition for the tensile fracture of solder joint when applying an high electric current passage on the solder joint. Su F. et al [6] , Kinney C. et al [7] and Zhao G. F. et al [8] found the creep rate would increase with the increase of electric current density, respectively. Kinney C. et al [7,9] attributed this phenomenon to temperature rather than EM because they thought EM might reduce the creep rate of solder joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kinney C. et al [7,9] attributed this phenomenon to temperature rather than EM because they thought EM might reduce the creep rate of solder joint. But Zhao G. F. et al [8] considered this phenomenon resulted from the combination effect of Joule heating and EM. Liu H. Y. et al [10] reported stress-relaxation rate of tin-based solder joint increased significantly after current stressing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%