2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-022-07368-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Outcome of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Atrial Fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 14 A similar conclusion was also drawn in 2 other retrospective studies, as the use of SGLT2i among patients with AF and comorbid diabetes undergoing ablation was associated with lower incidence of AF recurrence comparing to those without SGLT2i. 15 , 16 Our results alone and the pooled results from our meta‐analysis were in line with conclusions from the aforementioned studies, showing the potential attenuating effect of SGLT2i on AF recurrence after CA. Further large RCTs are required to testify to the effect of SGLT2i on AF recurrence in patients with diabetes undergoing CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 14 A similar conclusion was also drawn in 2 other retrospective studies, as the use of SGLT2i among patients with AF and comorbid diabetes undergoing ablation was associated with lower incidence of AF recurrence comparing to those without SGLT2i. 15 , 16 Our results alone and the pooled results from our meta‐analysis were in line with conclusions from the aforementioned studies, showing the potential attenuating effect of SGLT2i on AF recurrence after CA. Further large RCTs are required to testify to the effect of SGLT2i on AF recurrence in patients with diabetes undergoing CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…After removing duplicates, the titles, abstracts, and full‐text articles were screened for all potentially eligible studies for inclusion. A total of 4 studies 14 , 15 , 16 (including this study) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in our meta‐analysis (Figure 4 ). The risk of bias was rated as low by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale, and basic information and patients’ baseline are shown in Table S6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%