2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of damaged starch on the rheological properties of wheat starch suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
70
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
11
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Response surface plots of bread quality parameters. DS damaged starch, AMY a-amylase, AMG amyloglucosidase, SVB specific bread volume, DR dimension ratio, F firmness J Food Sci Technol (October 2016) 53(10):3675-3684 3681 reducing sugars produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of the gelatinized DS granules, which have the ability to gelatinize spontaneously in cold water (Barrera et al 2013(Barrera et al , 2015Tester 1997;Morrison et al 1994). DS content significantly modified the response of most attributes of bread quality as expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Response surface plots of bread quality parameters. DS damaged starch, AMY a-amylase, AMG amyloglucosidase, SVB specific bread volume, DR dimension ratio, F firmness J Food Sci Technol (October 2016) 53(10):3675-3684 3681 reducing sugars produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of the gelatinized DS granules, which have the ability to gelatinize spontaneously in cold water (Barrera et al 2013(Barrera et al , 2015Tester 1997;Morrison et al 1994). DS content significantly modified the response of most attributes of bread quality as expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The level of damage is related to wheat hardness and milling conditions (Hoseney 1994). The granular integrity of starch is affected by mechanical damage, resulting in modifications of rheological behavior and functional properties of the starch systems (Barrera et al 2012(Barrera et al , 2013Morrison et al 1994;Tester et al 1994). Damage of the starch granule facilitates swelling of granules (Tester 1997) and consequently, DS granules have the ability to absorb more water than native granules, and are more hydrolyzed by amylases (Hoseney 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diverse damaged starch content, changes in the particle size of the flour or differences in starch accessibility might explain the different pasting performance. Barrera et al (2013) mentioned that damaged starch granules facilitated hydration and swelling, increasing the viscosity of unheated starches. In the present study, in spite of the damaged starch content of the samples was significant different, pasting plots did not reveal differences on the shoulder exhibited during heat, which has been related to the amount of damaged starch (Fig.…”
Section: Pasting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in damaged starch content and particle size distribution between flours is reported to affect the RVA profile [47]. Damaged starch granules can absorb water, swell and leach out amylose and amylopectin, which causes an increase in the viscosity of starch [48].…”
Section: Figure 2 Microscopic Structure Of Dry (A) Semi-wet (B) Andmentioning
confidence: 99%