2015
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dairy farming system, herd, season, parity, and days in milk on modeling of the coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis of bovine milk

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to characterize the variation in curd firmness model parameters obtained from coagulating bovine milk samples, and to investigate the effects of the dairy system, season, individual farm, and factors related to individual cows (days in milk and parity). Individual milk samples (n = 1,264) were collected during the evening milking of 85 farms representing different environments and farming systems in the northeastern Italian Alps. The dairy herds were classified into 4 farming … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The iterative estimation procedure applied to the 240 point measurements of 4.4% (49 of 1,121 ewes) of the milk samples for the estimation of the individual CF t model parameters did not comply with the required convergence criteria. An incidence of 6.8% (85 of 1,243 cows) has been recorded in a large survey on Brown Swiss cows (Bittante et al, 2015). In both cows and ewes, the nonconvergent samples were characterized by a physico-chemical composition similar to the convergent samples (Table 2) but had a larger RCT than the average value (+39% for ovine and +76% for bovine species) and especially of SD (+195% for ovine and +64% for bovine species).…”
Section: Nonconverging Curd Firmness Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The iterative estimation procedure applied to the 240 point measurements of 4.4% (49 of 1,121 ewes) of the milk samples for the estimation of the individual CF t model parameters did not comply with the required convergence criteria. An incidence of 6.8% (85 of 1,243 cows) has been recorded in a large survey on Brown Swiss cows (Bittante et al, 2015). In both cows and ewes, the nonconvergent samples were characterized by a physico-chemical composition similar to the convergent samples (Table 2) but had a larger RCT than the average value (+39% for ovine and +76% for bovine species) and especially of SD (+195% for ovine and +64% for bovine species).…”
Section: Nonconverging Curd Firmness Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If not-converged samples were characterized by an increase in RCT and a tendency for an increase of k 20 and reductions of a 30 , a 45 , and a 60 , then the traditional MCP were not much affected (Table 1). However, larger differences concerning the traditional MCP have been observed in dairy cows (Bittante et al, 2015).…”
Section: Nonconverging Curd Firmness Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a large survey on Brown Swiss cows, Bittante et al (2015) prolonged the test duration to 90 min and observed in almost all samples a decrease in CF in the final part of the test due to syneresis and whey expulsion. In the present study, with a test duration of 60 min, the decreasing phase was not evident in the majority of samples nor could the syneresis instant rate constant be estimated.…”
Section: Milk Quality Coagulation Traits and Curd Firming Modelingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A 10-mL aliquot of the 2-L subsample was used for determination of MCP by Formagraph (Foss Electric A/S) according to the method described in detail by Bittante et al (2015). Only rennet (0.051 IMCU/mL of milk) was added to each sample, and curd firmness was recorded every 15 s for 60 min by the instrument, yielding 240 measurements per milk sample, 4 of which were used to determine the traditional single-point MCP parameters [RCT, k 20 , a 30 , and curd firmness 45 min after rennet addition (a 45 )].…”
Section: Traditional Mcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can also predict the maximum curd firmness estimated by the CF t function (CF max ) and the time taken to reach this value (t max ). To improve repeatability, CF P was estimated using a linear regression based on the CF max (CF P = 1.34 × CF max ) according to data recorded by Bittante et al (2015).…”
Section: Modeling Curd Firmness and Syneresismentioning
confidence: 99%