To the Editors:Aspergillus fumigatus infection is common in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and estimates of the rate of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis range from 1-15%. Voriconazole, a new triazole antifungal, has been recognised as efficient and safe in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis [1][2]. Since it is available orally, voriconazole became the first alternative to itraconazole. We began giving voriconazole to CF patients in 2003, and we encountered an unexpectedly high frequency of moderate-tosevere skin reactions, which limited the administration of the drug.We therefore reviewed all the medical files of children (aged ,18 yrs; n572) and adults (n563) followed up in our tertiary CF reference centre between April 2003 and December 2008, in order to estimate the frequency of voriconazole-induced photosensitivity, as previously defined [3]. All the patients who were given voraconazole were selected. Demographic data, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations, clinical data, treatment, duration and voriconazole dosage, and related adverse effects (AEs) were collected. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons were analysed using the Chi-squared test and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, respectively. Multivariate analyses were performed by using stepwise logistic regression.A p-value ,0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 8 (StatSoft, MaisonsAlfort, France).