2020
DOI: 10.5152/actavet.2020.19029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cysteamine on the Freezing of Buck Semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have suggested that the removal of buck SP prevents agglutination and positively affects sperm properties in frozen‐thawed semen (Cabrera et al., 2005). On the other hand, there are also studies reporting that the presence of SP does not have negative effects even though buck spermatozoa are agglutinated during freezing/thawing, and post‐thaw motility rates are found to be similar (Erturk et al., 2020; Tabarez et al., 2017). In the current study, there was no statistical difference between the groups, supporting the notion that the removal of SP did not have any role in the negative results encountered in the freezing of buck semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have suggested that the removal of buck SP prevents agglutination and positively affects sperm properties in frozen‐thawed semen (Cabrera et al., 2005). On the other hand, there are also studies reporting that the presence of SP does not have negative effects even though buck spermatozoa are agglutinated during freezing/thawing, and post‐thaw motility rates are found to be similar (Erturk et al., 2020; Tabarez et al., 2017). In the current study, there was no statistical difference between the groups, supporting the notion that the removal of SP did not have any role in the negative results encountered in the freezing of buck semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buck spermatozoa coagulate in egg yolk-based diluting and freezing media, which are commonly preferred in several species, due to EYCE found in seminal plasma, causing a failure to achieve desired sperm properties after freezing and thawing procedures (Üstüner & Ülgen, 2009). Several studies have suggested that the removal of buck SP prevents agglutination and positively affects sperm properties in frozenthawed semen (Cabrera et al, 2005 also studies reporting that the presence of SP does not have negative effects even though buck spermatozoa are agglutinated during freezing/thawing, and post-thaw motility rates are found to be similar (Erturk et al, 2020;Tabarez et al, 2017). In the current study, there was no statistical difference between the groups, supporting the notion that the removal of SP did not have any role in the negative results encountered in the freezing of buck semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation