2002
DOI: 10.1080/028275802753742936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cuttings on the Scenic Beauty of a Tree Stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values and policies relating to conservation are also highly related to tree retention practices. To the authors' knowledge, there are very few social studies that specifically address tree retention (but see Silvennoinen et al, 2002;Uliczka, 2003;Tö nnes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values and policies relating to conservation are also highly related to tree retention practices. To the authors' knowledge, there are very few social studies that specifically address tree retention (but see Silvennoinen et al, 2002;Uliczka, 2003;Tö nnes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given everyman's rights, however, the forest owner will not be compensated for providing recreational environments, and lacks a financial incentive to take the landscape and recreation into account in forest management. Especially large-scale clearcutting with intensive site preparation for regeneration have an adverse effect on the landscape (Ribe 2009;Silvennoinen, Pukkala, and Tahvanainen 2002;Gundersen and Frivold 2008;Tyrv€ ainen et al 2008;Tyrv€ ainen, Silvennoinen, and Hallikainen 2017), but delaying or abandoning clearcutting inflicts upon the forest owner a loss of income that is presently not compensated for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the earlier studies on the preferences on forest use, the majority of citizens, regardless of forest ownership, do not approve of clearcutting (Valkeapää and Karppinen 2013). Also, according to pairwise comparisons of edited photographs of various forest management alternatives (Silvennoinen et al 2002;Tönnes et al 2004;Ribe 2009), the scenic values in clearcut forests are consistently lower than in forests grown in denser, uneven-aged structures. Yet, it should be noted that the studies mentioned in the previous sentence estimated preferences for alternatives of clear cuttings, such as seedling tree or retention tree harvests, and were thus examined at initially very low tree densities and using close-range visualizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%