1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00129744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cutting height and cutting interval on dry matter yield of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) De Wit

Abstract: The effect of cutting height and cutting interval on dry matter production of Leucaena leucocephala (Lain) De Wit was investigated at Njala, Sierra Leone using three year old Leucaena trees. Four cutting heights, (25, 50, 75 and 100 cm), and two cutting intervals (one and three months), were adopted.Dry matter yields were highest at the 75 and 100 cm cutting heights, especially at the longer, three-monthly, cutting interval. They were significantly reduced by more frequent cutting, probably due to the increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Harris (1978) listed residual leaf area, activity of meristems remaining and rate of recovery of root regrowth as some of the factors which may influence plants to regrow after cutting. In contrast to the findings of Karim et al (1991), cutting at 30 cm above ground promoted sprouting in cv. Cunningham, originally selected for high leaf and good basal branching (Bray et al, 1988), but appeared severe and removed most leaf material and regrowth points of the other lines.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Harris (1978) listed residual leaf area, activity of meristems remaining and rate of recovery of root regrowth as some of the factors which may influence plants to regrow after cutting. In contrast to the findings of Karim et al (1991), cutting at 30 cm above ground promoted sprouting in cv. Cunningham, originally selected for high leaf and good basal branching (Bray et al, 1988), but appeared severe and removed most leaf material and regrowth points of the other lines.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Guevaria et al (1978) also found increased dry matter yield with less frequent cutting of L. leucocephala. Dry matter yield of L. leucocephala declined (Karim et al, 1991) with frequent cutting due to an increased number of recovery phases, which affected the recovery of carbohydrate reserves and lowered the rate of dry matter production (Erdmann et al, 1993). Erdmann et al (1993) reported a significantly greater number of shoots on Gliricidia sepium cut at 25cm above ground compared to those cut at 100cm.…”
Section: Effects Of Cutting On Browse Yield and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too high root system decrease led decrase of DM production and longer recovery periode, where regrowth after defoliation related to carbohydrate and mineral reserves in root (Wilson & Ludlow 1991). Karim et al (1991) said that increasing plant age resulted lower ratio of leaves and branches. This low ratio affected crude protein and energy content.…”
Section: Production Of I Zollingerianamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by Dewhurst et al (2009) that increase of gross energy of forage was alwasy in line with increase of crude fiber of dry material of forage especially cellulose component which ease to be hydrolized by acid or cellulose enzyme resulted by ruminal microorganism into monomer glucose. Karim et al (1991) reported that increase of plant age and dry stress decreased ratio of leaves/stems, meanwhile increased ratio of stems/leaves. This decreased crude protein content, but instead increased gross energy.…”
Section: Nutrient Content Of I Zollingerianamentioning
confidence: 99%