2011
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.054304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cuticular abrasion and recovery on water loss rates in queens of the desert harvester ant Messor pergandei

Abstract: SUMMARYFactors that affect water loss rates (WLRs) are poorly known for organisms in natural habitats. Seed-harvester ant queens provide an ideal system for examining such factors because WLRs for mated queens excavated from their incipient nests are twofold to threefold higher than those of alate queens. Indirect data suggest that this increase results from soil particles abrading the cuticle during nest excavation. This study provides direct support for the cuticle abrasion hypothesis by measuring total mass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study where the cuticle of ants was abraded, and water loss was measured using respirometry, the increased total water loss was due to increased cuticular transpiration and not via increased RWL or metabolic rate (Johnson et al, 2011). This suggests that handling does not necessarily elevate either metabolic rate or respiratory water loss in insects, and supports our assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In a study where the cuticle of ants was abraded, and water loss was measured using respirometry, the increased total water loss was due to increased cuticular transpiration and not via increased RWL or metabolic rate (Johnson et al, 2011). This suggests that handling does not necessarily elevate either metabolic rate or respiratory water loss in insects, and supports our assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The reactants only become active (or are catalysed) upon arriving at the injury site. If damage to the outer surface due to abrasions can be detected and responded to (Johnson et al, 2011), then it is possible that micro-damage such as that caused by stressing an insect tibia close to failure can also be detected and responded to e perhaps at a level much lower than has been previously observed. Can layer delamination, fibre or matrix cracking or bond breaking also be detected by these pore canals filaments?…”
Section: Self-repairmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…abrasions using fine emery paper (Lai-Fook, 1968;Johnson et al, 2011). But how does the insect detect this damage if the cuticle is acellular?…”
Section: Self-repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals were given a period of at least 5min to settle in the cuvette before recording commenced. When handling the animals, care was taken to minimize contact with the cuticle to avoid accidental abrasion, which could elevate CWL rates (see Johnson et al, 2011). Pilot trials with visual observation or recordings with a custom-built electronic activity detector clearly showed that activity abolished cyclic or DGE patterns, and resulted in the exhibition of CGE.…”
Section: Respirometrymentioning
confidence: 99%