2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Culprit-Lesion Remodeling Versus Plaque Rupture on Three-Year Outcome in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to plaque characteristics, remodeling index was a conventional IVUS predictor of OCT-derived TCFA. This is quite concordant with the previous IVUS studies demonstrating that positive arterial remodeling is a characteristic finding of the ACS (22)(23)(24) and thus a marker of vulnerable or high-risk plaque (5,16,(25)(26)(27). Our present study further demonstrated the direct correlation between plaque components and thickness of the fibrous cap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to plaque characteristics, remodeling index was a conventional IVUS predictor of OCT-derived TCFA. This is quite concordant with the previous IVUS studies demonstrating that positive arterial remodeling is a characteristic finding of the ACS (22)(23)(24) and thus a marker of vulnerable or high-risk plaque (5,16,(25)(26)(27). Our present study further demonstrated the direct correlation between plaque components and thickness of the fibrous cap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, 39.5% of patients with ACS had other coronary plaque lesions derived from a culprit lesion related to the event 20) . Vulnerable plaque in non-target vessels is reportedly an important predictor of future critical cardiac events in IVUS studies 21) ; therefore, plaque regression in another coronary lesion could lead to the suppression of other events. We also considered that clinical outcome would be a more desirable and valid endpoint than simple plaque burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Moreover, recent 3-vessel IVUS studies have also revealed that plaque rupture may be present not only in the culprit lesion but also in nonculprit lesions. [5][6][7][8][9] Those multiple plaque ruptures have been reported in 16% to 79% of the patients with ACS, 3,[5][6][7][8][9][10] suggesting the presence of pan-coronary artery vulnerability, possibly as a result of systemic inflammation. 8 Although a possible link between coronary arterial vulnerability and carotid arterial instability was suspected, the incidence and clinical significance of plaque rupture in the peripheral arteries have not been fully investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%