2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of crystal habits on the surface energy and cohesion of crystalline powders

Abstract: The role of surface properties, influenced by particle processing, in particle-particle interactions (powder cohesion) is investigated in this study. Wetting behaviour of mefenamic acid was found to be anisotropic by sessile drop contact angle measurements on macroscopic (>1cm) single crystals, with variations in contact angle of water from 56.3° to 92.0°. This is attributed to variations in surface chemical functionality at specific facets, and confirmed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Using a f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we have presented surface energy versus surface coverage plots to demonstrate level of surface heterogeneity of pharmaceutical materials as a function of milling intensity (Shah et al, 2014a). Furthermore, data for comparing surface energy heterogeneity before and after silanisation is reported, evidently suggesting that surfaces are homogeneous post silanisation (Shah et al, 2014a;Shah et al, 2014b;Shah et al, 2014c ).…”
Section: De-coupling the Contributions Of Surface Area And Surface Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, we have presented surface energy versus surface coverage plots to demonstrate level of surface heterogeneity of pharmaceutical materials as a function of milling intensity (Shah et al, 2014a). Furthermore, data for comparing surface energy heterogeneity before and after silanisation is reported, evidently suggesting that surfaces are homogeneous post silanisation (Shah et al, 2014a;Shah et al, 2014b;Shah et al, 2014c ).…”
Section: De-coupling the Contributions Of Surface Area And Surface Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determining dispersive surface energy, a series of dispersive n-alkane probes were injected at a range of concentrations to achieve fractional surface coverages (n/nm) ranging from 0.007 to 0.1. For surface energy measurements to be representative of the entire material surface properties, typical fractional coverages used for analysis ranges from n/nm=0.02 to 0.05 (Gamble et al, 2013;Gamble et al, 2012;Shah et al, 2014a;Shah et al, 2014b). Considering the range of fractional surface coverages typically used to provide material representative surface energy, n/nm=0.04 was selected for analysis of both silanised and unsilanised materials.…”
Section: Surface Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations