2019
DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1698774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cryoprotectant-free vitrification versus conventional freezing on human testicular sperm motility: a prospective comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-concentration permeable cryoprotectants are cytotoxic and cannot be used for sperm vitrification due to the uniqueness of sperm [ 56 ]. The nonpermeable protectant sucrose can be used for rapid freezing and vitrification of sperm, and vitrification can achieve higher sperm motility [ 57 , 58 ]. At present, studies discussing sperm vitrification are focused on the selection of cryoprotectants and optimization of the cooling process [ 59 ].…”
Section: Application and Advantages Of The Vitrification Technique In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-concentration permeable cryoprotectants are cytotoxic and cannot be used for sperm vitrification due to the uniqueness of sperm [ 56 ]. The nonpermeable protectant sucrose can be used for rapid freezing and vitrification of sperm, and vitrification can achieve higher sperm motility [ 57 , 58 ]. At present, studies discussing sperm vitrification are focused on the selection of cryoprotectants and optimization of the cooling process [ 59 ].…”
Section: Application and Advantages Of The Vitrification Technique In...mentioning
confidence: 99%