2016
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2016.1223525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of crushable blockouts on a full-scale guardrail system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations used for the different parameters have been described in detail in a separate study. 14 To validate the post–soil interaction, a series of dynamic tests conducted by Coon 22 were used. The dynamic test consisted of an instrumented rigid impactor of 946 kg traveling at speed V and impacting the post 55 cm above the ground.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculations used for the different parameters have been described in detail in a separate study. 14 To validate the post–soil interaction, a series of dynamic tests conducted by Coon 22 were used. The dynamic test consisted of an instrumented rigid impactor of 946 kg traveling at speed V and impacting the post 55 cm above the ground.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a trade-off between accuracy and computation time is needed. Sassi et al 14 evaluated three mesh sizes for the post and the W-beam based on a qualitative evaluation of the interaction between the pickup and the guardrail beam. The results showed that any coarse mesh (60 or 80 mm) offered less compliance with the guardrail system and led to undesirable truck kinematics and penetration of the guardrail beam.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although most parts of the simplified model were roughly modeled, it has been widely used in many studies (Atahan, 2002; Reid et al, 2009). The model was cleaned from its intersections and penetrations then updated to include more realistic parameters for the suspension, seats, and tires (Sassi et al, 2017). The parameters of this model’s physical system are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [ K ] is the stiffness matrix, [ C ] is the damping matrix, [ M ] is the mass matrix, { q } is the displacement vector, and { F ( t ) } are the force vectors. The detailed composition of the matrices is thoroughly explained in Sassi et al (2017) and Sassi and Sassi (2015).…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%