2012
DOI: 10.7782/ijr.2012.5.2.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Crosswind on Derailment of Railway Vehicles Running on Curved Track at Low Speed

Abstract: Owing to the lightening of railway vehicles and increased operation speeds, the reduction of running safety in the presence of crosswind is becoming an important problem. In particular, the running safety tends to decrease when vehicles run on curved track. When a crosswind acts on a vehicle negotiating a curve from the outer side, flange climbing can occur. In this study, a full-vehicle model was constructed using the multi-body simulation software SIMPACK, and a simulation of a bogie vehicle with two-axle tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Takahiro Hosoi [15] used MBD (multibody dynamics) simulation to obtain the derailment coefficient for all wheels when cross-wind was applied in a curved track. In addition, the derailment coefficients according to vehicle speeds and wind speeds were analyzed.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Takahiro Hosoi [15] used MBD (multibody dynamics) simulation to obtain the derailment coefficient for all wheels when cross-wind was applied in a curved track. In addition, the derailment coefficients according to vehicle speeds and wind speeds were analyzed.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-wind with exciting frequency can act on vehicles due to railside structures that are repeatedly placed, as in Figure 3, when running on a bridge. However, the theoretical derailment equations due to cross-wind in the previous studies could only statically evaluate the derailment risk under a constant wind speed condition [10,19], and the fluctuant wind or gust conditions have been evaluated using a multibody dynamics simulation [15,16,20]. In this paper, a theoretical formula on the risk of derailment was derived considering cross-winds with varying wind forces generated by structures displaced at regular intervals on the trackside.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High winds are frequently seen as a cause of derailment on main lines, blowing rolling stock off tracks. The winds might be more ef-fective in moving rolling stock on railway turnouts as the running safety regarding crosswind stability of the vehicles tends to decrease on curved and moving track systems (Hosoi and Tanifuji, 2012).…”
Section: High Wind and Tornadoesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of the accident was presumed to be strong winds. 9 To prevent such accidents, a regulation in the restriction of running speed of railway vehicles was established according to the speed of strong crosswinds. However, the ride comfort is impaired and the running stability of vehicles is deteriorated, sometimes leading to derailment because the vehicle is made to run on the curved line at a low speed owing to the running speed restriction under strong crosswinds.…”
Section: Model Of Railway Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the 3 km track irregularity data measured from Gyeongbu High-Speed Railway, they studied the safety of the vehicle traveling on a curve with a radius of curvature of 7000 m with crosswind speeds at 15, 30, and 45 m/s. With the help of the multibody dynamics program, SIMPACK, Hosoi and Tanifuji 9 calculated the derailment coefficient of each wheel when the car was traveling on a curve in a crosswind. This simulation focused on the safety, including vertical wheel load reduction and derailment coefficient, of a vehicle with a 65 mm cant traveling on a sharp curve with a curvature radius of 160 m during a 90° crosswind, but it did not consider the track irregularity and assumed constant wind speed at the curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%