1994
DOI: 10.1177/004051759406400602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Crosslinking Agents on Water Repellency of Cotton Fabrics Treated with Fluorocarbon Resin

Abstract: Cotton fabrics and cellulose films treated with fluorocarbon resin (Asahi Guard AG-480 ) with and without crosslinking agents (isocyanate blocked copolymer and aziridine) were washed and subsequently heat treated. Water repellency of the fabrics decreased with washing and recovered with heat treatment. The decreased water re pellency with washing was controlled by using the resin with a crosslinking agent. To investigate surface tension and surface chemical composition of the fabrics after washing and subseque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal water repellent cotton fabrics are hydrophobic on the fiber surfaces to resist water, yet porous to allow moisture transport for comfort. Efforts to reduce the hydrophilicity of cotton have involved surface modification using hydrophobic compounds, such as fluorocarbons (Jiang et al 2005;McCord et al 2003;Sato et al 1994), silicones (Lee et al 2005;Yuen et al 2005) and hydrocarbons (Sawatari et al 1998). These technologies have varying effectiveness and durability in achieving water repellent cotton fabrics although are limited by their sustainability and environmental concerns and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal water repellent cotton fabrics are hydrophobic on the fiber surfaces to resist water, yet porous to allow moisture transport for comfort. Efforts to reduce the hydrophilicity of cotton have involved surface modification using hydrophobic compounds, such as fluorocarbons (Jiang et al 2005;McCord et al 2003;Sato et al 1994), silicones (Lee et al 2005;Yuen et al 2005) and hydrocarbons (Sawatari et al 1998). These technologies have varying effectiveness and durability in achieving water repellent cotton fabrics although are limited by their sustainability and environmental concerns and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact angle obviously decreased by washing and recovered by subsequent heat treatment, especially at temperature over 80". Also, we reported the same water repellency on the cotton and polyester fabrics treated with fluorocarbon resin [4,5,9]. Therefore, it seems that the behavior by the fluorocarbon resin treatment takes place independent of the fiber substrate.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Above explanation is all speculation. Detail of the phenomenon is not clear at present [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another characterization was carried out on cotton fabrics by XPS, detecting the surface of samples by a survey scan and a high resolution scan of the C1s orbital [17]. Even in this case the presence of the finishing agent is revealed by the detection of F and Si on the surface of Fluorolink and MEMO treated samples respectively, as reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Xps Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%