2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cross breeding and amount of finishing diet on growth parameters, carcass and meat composition of foals slaughtered at 15months of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
61
15
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
37
61
15
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Within SFA, palmitic acid (C 16:0 ) was the most abundant fatty acid, showing significant differences (P = 0.001) between production systems, as foals from the SES group presented the highest values (mean value of 27.8%) compared with those from the FES group (25.7%). These results are in agreement with those found by Franco et al (2013), Lorenzo et al (2013b) and Polidori et al (2008) as palmitic acid was the main SFA in equine meat.…”
Section: Lorenzo Crecente Franco Victoria Sarriés and Gómezsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Within SFA, palmitic acid (C 16:0 ) was the most abundant fatty acid, showing significant differences (P = 0.001) between production systems, as foals from the SES group presented the highest values (mean value of 27.8%) compared with those from the FES group (25.7%). These results are in agreement with those found by Franco et al (2013), Lorenzo et al (2013b) and Polidori et al (2008) as palmitic acid was the main SFA in equine meat.…”
Section: Lorenzo Crecente Franco Victoria Sarriés and Gómezsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…LW presented the lowest values (P < 0.001) in FES compared with 1.5 SES group (+41 kg) and 3 SES animals (+58 kg). This result was lower than those reported by Franco et al (2013) who found mean values of 284 kg in foals slaughtered at 15 months. The LW of the animals consequently influenced (P < 0.001) CW as the CW of the 3 SES group was higher compared with the FES group (Table 1).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations