2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40723-019-0061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cropland and livestock ownership on child labour in eastern Ethiopia: empirical examination of the Wealth Paradox

Abstract: Child labour exploitation is one of the development challenges that most developing countries experienced commonly. Worldwide, 218 million children of ages 5-17 are involved in child labour (ILO 2017), wherein 126 million work in dangerous conditions. In sub-Saharan Africa alone 29% of the labour force sourced from children with ages of 5-14 (ILO 2000). Persistent poverty and labour intensive nature of the economic activity, which is an agrarian type, are the pillar reasons for the child labour exploitation an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used both species richness and cultivated area as response variables. Fixed effects comprised total harvested area (ha) and number of livestock, both serving as proxies for farmer affluence (Shumetie & Mamo, 2019). We also applied a proxy for regional accessibility, comprising travel time to the nearest town (extracted at 1 km resolution from Ethiogis 3; http://www.ethiogis-mapserver.org) and a poverty index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used both species richness and cultivated area as response variables. Fixed effects comprised total harvested area (ha) and number of livestock, both serving as proxies for farmer affluence (Shumetie & Mamo, 2019). We also applied a proxy for regional accessibility, comprising travel time to the nearest town (extracted at 1 km resolution from Ethiogis 3; http://www.ethiogis-mapserver.org) and a poverty index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers used less farmyard manure than the recommended amount perhaps because of the low supply of organic matter. This is attributable to the low number of livestock units owned by farmers in the study area [51]. The low use of farmyard manure as fertilizer material by the farmers may also be attributed to competing uses of the material as the source of energy for cooking [52].…”
Section: Management Practices Of Farmyard Manure (Fym)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In decreasing order of severity, bulkiness for transport, limited availability, and poor knowledge about the importance of farmyard manure for maintaining and improving soil fertility were the most significant constraints that potato farmers faced (Table 5). The limited availability of farmyard manure may be due to the low number of livestock units owned by farmers in the study area [51]. The cost of transporting the fertilizer is high given its sheer bulk, and the application process is tedious.…”
Section: Constraints In the Use Of Fymmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because livestock requires more attention for care and feeding to ensure that they have the food and water. This may result in household members devoting most of their time to rearing animals, thereby trading off off-farm work (Shumetie and Mamo 2019). Moreover, such a scenario is most likely if the livestock is associated with more income-generating opportunities than alternative off-farm work participation, everything else held constant.…”
Section: Determinants Of Participation In Off-farm Work Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%