Effect of cracks on the pressure dependence of P wave velocities in crystalline rocks

Abstract

To test the “bed of nails” model, we have made detailed measurements of P wave velocities in five low‐porosity, crystalline rocks at effective pressures to 500 MPa and fit two equations based on the model to the laboratory data. The first equation, V(P) = V0(1 + P/ Pi)(1 ‐ m)/2, applies at relatively low pressures because it assumes that the grain modulus is very much larger than the crack modulus. It can be fit to four of the five data sets. The fit to the data for a monomineralic epidote yields values for V0, Piand m of 8.02±0.02 km/s, 1.2±0.5 MPa, and 0.9845±0.0004, respectively, with a rms error of 6.28 m/s. The second equation, 1/V2 (P) = (1/Vc2 ‐ Vg2)/(1 + P/Pi)1 ‐ m + 1/Vg2 assigns a constant velocity to the grains and applies when the modulus of the cracks is of the order of the grain modulus at high pressures. This equation can be fit to three of the data sets; the fit to data for a diopside pyroxenite yields values of Vc, Vg, Pi, and m of 6.20±0.04 km/s, 8.28±0.02 km/s, 7±1 MPa, and 0.20±0.05, with a rms error of 17.9 m/s. For all seven fits to the laboratory data the rms errors range from 0.1 to 0.3% and are of the order of the limits of precision of the measurements. The “bed of nails” model explains the pressure dependence of P wave velocities in the samples remarkably well, as evidenced by the small rms errors. The variation with pressure of P wave velocities in these rocks clearly reflects the increasing stiffness of cracks. The fact that the first equation fits four of five data sets is one of several indications that cracks significantly affect the mechanical properties of the rocks even at 500 MPa. Finally, we note that different kinds of cracks have markedly different mechanical properties; the best fitting model parameters reflect the nature of the cracks which populate the samples.

Surface wave imaging of the weakly extended Malawi Rift from ambient-noise and teleseismic Rayleigh waves from onshore and lake-bottom seismometers

“…A reduction in velocities beneath the rift at periods sensitive to the crust and uppermost mantle could be explained by localized fracturing and deformation associated with extension (Carlson & Gangi 1985) or elevated temperatures. These observations are counter to what is observed in magmatic rifts, where lower crustal velocities are higher beneath the rift than outside it owing to extensive magmatic intrusion to the lower and middle crust (e.g.…”

Seismological evidence for variable growth of crust along the Izu intraoceanic arc

“…The upper crust was excluded from the estimation, because upper crustal velocities are considered to be strongly affected by several parameters other than crustal composition, such as variable fracture distribution and porosity [e.g., Carlson and Gangi, 1985;Kelemen and Holbrook, 1995]. This indicates that our estimated average velocity represents the composition of the middle to lower crust.…”

“…In the depth range of the upper crust, several other factors control velocities, such as porosity changes due to variations in the degree of fracturing [Carlson and Gangi, 1985;Ganchin et al, 1998]. Therefore velocity data from the upper crust are unsuitable for the determination of the composition of that layer.…”

Predictability of properties of a fractured geothermal reservoir: the opportunities and limitations of an outcrop analogue study

“…Since dynamic as well as static Young's moduli increase with depth (e.g. Carlson and Gangi 1985;Holt et al 2005), Young's modulus at reservoir depth should therefore be higher than at the surface. Thus, Young's modulus at reservoir depth has been highly underestimated.…”