2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.69.035104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of coupling of forward- and backward-going electron-hole pairs on the static local-field factor of jellium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is exploited especially for the cumbersome Bethe-Salpeter calculations [29]. An increasing though moderate importance of the coupling of resonant and antiresonant contributions with increasing Q has been found for the static structure factor of jellium by Tsolakidis, Shirley, and Martin [30]. Our results show drastic consequences of the antiresonant contributions for frequencydependent spectra of real materials: Local-field effects create a sharp peak at about 27 eV (inset in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This fact is exploited especially for the cumbersome Bethe-Salpeter calculations [29]. An increasing though moderate importance of the coupling of resonant and antiresonant contributions with increasing Q has been found for the static structure factor of jellium by Tsolakidis, Shirley, and Martin [30]. Our results show drastic consequences of the antiresonant contributions for frequencydependent spectra of real materials: Local-field effects create a sharp peak at about 27 eV (inset in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…2, we would like to note that, e.g., for r s = 2 the local-field factor of Ref. 23 used in paper I gives the increase of the ratio by a factor of 1.24.…”
Section: A Quasiparticle Self-energymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the sum of the ladder diagrams is reduced to this interaction just as vertex corrections to the random phase approximation (RPA) polarizability can be reduced to the spin-symmetric local-field factor (see, e.g., Refs. 21,22,23,24,25). However, the point is that the interaction W is defined by an eightfold integral and as such is problematical to be realized in ab initio calculations for real systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Na jellium clusters (r s = 3.93) set with magic electron numbers 2,8,18,20,34,40,58,92,and 106,used in Refs. 42,44, and 93.…”
Section: Local Band-gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jellium-with-gap model 29 , was developed outside the KS framework, using perturbation theory to take into account the band gap energy. This model was used to have qualitative and quantitative insight for semiconductors [30][31][32][33][34] , to develop an XC kernel for the optical properties of materials 35 , and to construct accurate correlation energy functionals for the ground-state DFT 29,[36][37][38][39][40] . We will show that the Lindhard function for the jellium-with-gap model (F GAP ), previously introduced by Levine and Louie 33 in a different context (dielectric constant and XC potential), may be seen as a sophisticated analytical form suitable for KE approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%