2018
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b1600529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corticosteroids on atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Our meta-analysis suggested that periprocedural administration of corticosteroids of catheter ablation was associated with reduction of early but not late recurrence of AF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, inflammation plays a role in AF. A meta-analysis suggested that periprocedural administration of corticosteroids after catheter ablation was associated with a reduction in early but not late recurrence of AF [27].…”
Section: Preprocedural Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, inflammation plays a role in AF. A meta-analysis suggested that periprocedural administration of corticosteroids after catheter ablation was associated with a reduction in early but not late recurrence of AF [27].…”
Section: Preprocedural Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, molecules employed to reduce ER include AADs, corticosteroids, and colchicine. Still, only the latter has shown favorable long‐term outcomes 4,50–53 . The idea of early redo ablation is not a novel one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, only the latter has shown favorable long-term outcomes. 4,[50][51][52][53] The idea of early redo ablation is not a novel one. In 2008, Lellouche et al 54 reported that early reablation (for arrhythmia recurrence during the first month of the BP) was associated with increased arrhythmia-free survival in the long-term (51% vs. 91% p, < .0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following information was extracted from each study: first author, title, journal name, publication date, study periods, regions, sample size, demographic data (e.g., gender, age), chronic medical conditions (e.g., comorbidities, smoking history), clinical features (e.g., fever, headache), laboratory results (e.g., leukocytes, neutrophils), and radiographical features (e.g., ground-glass opacity, bilateral pulmonary infiltration). Three components, including selection, comparability, and exposure or outcome, were assessed for each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (Jaiswal et al, 2018;Xu and Lu, 2019). This consisted of eight items with a full score of nine stars (Stang, 2010).…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%