2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2007.909032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Core Magnetization on Frequency Response Analysis (FRA) of Power Transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees well with the fact that in a rapid transient condition, the flux lines tend to center around the conductors rather than penetrating the iron core and for high-frequency components of surges, the iron core acts effectively as an earthed boundary [9]. Some studies [10], [11] have neglected the effect of distributed shunt conductance which is considered a valid assumption for impulse voltage distribution analysis in the case of a faultless transformer, but may not be adequate in the case of fault diagnosis. Neglecting shunt conductance in the equivalent circuit will eliminate the study of leakage fault inside a transformer which could have been caused by several reasons, such as insulation damage, ground shield, or hot spots.…”
Section: Transformer Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This agrees well with the fact that in a rapid transient condition, the flux lines tend to center around the conductors rather than penetrating the iron core and for high-frequency components of surges, the iron core acts effectively as an earthed boundary [9]. Some studies [10], [11] have neglected the effect of distributed shunt conductance which is considered a valid assumption for impulse voltage distribution analysis in the case of a faultless transformer, but may not be adequate in the case of fault diagnosis. Neglecting shunt conductance in the equivalent circuit will eliminate the study of leakage fault inside a transformer which could have been caused by several reasons, such as insulation damage, ground shield, or hot spots.…”
Section: Transformer Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The governing factor in this phenomenon is magnetic viscosity, which is defined as the time dependence of magnetization under a constant magnetic field. The impedance measurement, mainly below 10 kHz, is observed to be significantly dependant on DC magnetization, instances when power supply switches off, and demagnetization [19].…”
Section: Frequency Response Analysis (Fra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly shown in consistent magnitude deviations with possible slight shifts of low frequency resonances. In contrast, the overall response shape remains consistent compared with the reference ones [2,24]. RM does not normally affect responses above 20 kHz, which can be easily eliminated using core demagnetisation techniques.…”
Section: Residual Magnetisation (Rm)mentioning
confidence: 67%