2018
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cooking on glycemic index, antioxidant activities, α‐amylase, and α‐glucosidase inhibitory properties of two rice varieties

Abstract: This study was designed to investigate the influence of cooking on the glycemic index (GI), amylose, and amylopectin contents of two rice varieties. Two rice varieties (foreign long rice and ofada) were sourced for, divided into two, one portion cooked and the other used raw. The sugar, starch, amylose, and amylopectin contents as well as glycemic indices, antioxidant properties, and the ability of the rice to inhibit carbohydrate‐hydrolyzing enzymes (α‐amylase and α‐glucosidase) were determined. In addition, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, the meta-analysis involved fifty-seven articles, as exhibited in Figure 1 . According to the Cochrane Collaboration tool, eleven trials [ 6 , 24 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 54 ] were categorized as being at a low risk of bias, while forty-four were categorized as unclear [ 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], and two were categorized as being at a high risk of bias [ 18 , 26 ]. Details about the risk of bias are supplied in Figure 2 and Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In total, the meta-analysis involved fifty-seven articles, as exhibited in Figure 1 . According to the Cochrane Collaboration tool, eleven trials [ 6 , 24 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 54 ] were categorized as being at a low risk of bias, while forty-four were categorized as unclear [ 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], and two were categorized as being at a high risk of bias [ 18 , 26 ]. Details about the risk of bias are supplied in Figure 2 and Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-seven studies, involving 936 participants, were published from 2002 to 2019. Twenty-six studies [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 26 , 31 , 35 , 39 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ] used an in vitro experiment, while thirty-two studies involved in vivo experiments. Only one study used both in vitro and in vivo data experiments [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GI of 25 mg of samples uses 5‐ml stomach solution (KCl–HCl buffer pH 1.5), 2.5‐ml α‐amylase solution, 500‐µl sodium acetate pH 4.75, 5 µl of α‐glucosidase solution, DNSA solution (200 µl) and reads at an absorbance of 540 nm according to the method of Adedayo et al (2018). The sum of area under curve for each sample was divided by the sum of area under curve for standard glucose and multiplied by 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure and digestibility of starchy food can be affected by different processing methods, such as milling (i.e., wet and dry milling) and cooking (e.g., steaming, extrusion), and could further influence the glycemic response [8][9][10]. The use of different milling methods could result in a different content of damaged starch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%