2017
DOI: 10.4081/ija.2017.831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of contrasting crop rotation systems on soil chemical, biochemical properties and plant root growth in organic farming: first results

Abstract: Organic farming is claimed to improve soil fertility. Nonetheless, among organic practices, net C-inputs may largely vary in amount and composition and produce different soil conditions for microbial activity and plant-root system adaptation and development. In this study, we hypothesised that, in the regime of organic agriculture, soil chemical and biochemical properties can substantially differ under contrasting crop rotation systems and produce conditions of soil fertility to which the plant responds throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons behind the soil C depletion are not ascribable to microbial activities, as the heterotrophic soil respiration showed no differences between grassland, lentil and emmer (Figure 4). Nevertheless, similarly to other studies, the conversion of permanent grassland to cropland has indeed been shown to lead to decreased soil C stock [4,11]. The debate on the effects of water soil erosion on the soil C sink/source is still open, as diametrically opposing data emerge from the recent literature (e.g., [23]).…”
Section: Soil Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reasons behind the soil C depletion are not ascribable to microbial activities, as the heterotrophic soil respiration showed no differences between grassland, lentil and emmer (Figure 4). Nevertheless, similarly to other studies, the conversion of permanent grassland to cropland has indeed been shown to lead to decreased soil C stock [4,11]. The debate on the effects of water soil erosion on the soil C sink/source is still open, as diametrically opposing data emerge from the recent literature (e.g., [23]).…”
Section: Soil Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Enhancement of the soil C stock is considered a virtuous practice at the global scale, and there is wide agreement that conversion from arable land to grassland leads to soil C stock increases [4,13,29,35]. However, some recent studies have suggested that a change in short-term land use from permanent grassland (i.e., of >30 years) to arable lands (e.g., 2 years of corn) followed by a return to grassland can actually increase the soil C stock [15], although other studies have suggested that the light fraction of the organic matter of grasslands might be lost soon after the tillage [11].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although total organic carbon is the most widely used indicator to assess soil quality, soil productivity and agricultural sustainability [24,25], it is generally accepted that the change in its content is not very sensitive in the short and medium term [26,27], so labile fractions-which often include particulate organic carbon (POC), light fraction (LF), and water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) [28]-have been used as short-term indicators after changing soil management practices [29][30][31][32][33][34]. POC, LF and WSOC are three fractions considered active in the nutrient cycles, readily available for microbial breakdown and closely associated with nutrient supply to crops [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop rotations can also affect soil fertility and, hence, crop yields (Berzsenyi et al, 2000). Inclusion of legume leys in rotations increases the N supply (Riedell et al, 2009) as it is expected from N-fixing species, while enhancing other biochemical and physical aspects of soil fertility (Monaci et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%