2017
DOI: 10.1186/s41100-017-0093-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of continuous hemodiafiltration using an AN69ST membrane in patients with sepsis

Abstract: Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome caused by infectious disease. Severe sepsis and septic shock are extremely serious conditions with poor prognoses. It is reported that cytokines are deeply involved in the disease mechanism. Continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) using a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) membrane is reported to adsorb various cytokines and improve the status of patients with sepsis. Recently, another cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter, acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several aspects of this study that differ from those of previous studies which investigated the effect of the AN69ST membrane compared with the standard CRRT membrane [27][28][29][30]. Firstly, our previous study, which investigated the effect of the AN69ST membrane in patients with panperitonitis due to lower gastrointestinal perforation, did not show a signi cant difference in outcomes between the AN69ST membrane and standard CRRT membrane groups [30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several aspects of this study that differ from those of previous studies which investigated the effect of the AN69ST membrane compared with the standard CRRT membrane [27][28][29][30]. Firstly, our previous study, which investigated the effect of the AN69ST membrane in patients with panperitonitis due to lower gastrointestinal perforation, did not show a signi cant difference in outcomes between the AN69ST membrane and standard CRRT membrane groups [30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, the standard CRRT membrane has been widely replaced by the AN69ST membrane to absorb cytokines in critically ill patients in Japan, regardless of the cause of sepsis. However, only a few clinical studies [26][27][28][29][30] on the AN69ST membrane have been reported, and the clinical effectiveness of the AN69ST membrane is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AN69ST membrane has increased capacity for cytokine removal in vitro owing to its hydrogel structure that enables cytokine adsorption not only in the membrane surface, but also within the bulk layer [16][17][18][19]. However, only few clinical studies of AN69ST have been reported [20][21][22]. In addition, these studies investigated the clinical efficacy of the AN69ST membrane only in patients who underwent CRRT in the intensive care unit (ICU), and no study has investigated the clinical effect of the AN69ST membrane in patients with panperitonitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacies of AN69ST membranes and other adsorbing membranes have been compared previously. 11,12 A retrospective observational study by Tanaka et al reported that CRRT with AN69ST membranes stabilized the vital signs of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock compared to CRRT using polymethyl methacrylate membranes. 11 However, no studies till date have compared the value of AN69ST membranes vs nonadsorbing membranes in terms of clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 A retrospective observational study by Tanaka et al reported that CRRT with AN69ST membranes stabilized the vital signs of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock compared to CRRT using polymethyl methacrylate membranes. 11 However, no studies till date have compared the value of AN69ST membranes vs nonadsorbing membranes in terms of clinical outcomes. Moreover, previous studies comparing AN69ST membranes with other adsorbing membranes included patients with sepsis as defined by 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%