Effect of continuous and interval exercise training on the PETCO2 response during a graded exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease

Rocco, E; Prado, Danilo Marcelo Leite do; Silva, Alexandre G.; Lazzari, Jaqueline; Bortz, Pedro; Rocco, Débora Dias Ferraretto Moura; Rosa, Carla Gonçalves; Furlan, Valter

doi:10.6061/clinics/2012(06)13

Cited by 32 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From all reviewed studies, 4 showed a superior effect of HIIT over CAET on VȮ 2 peak and prescribed long intervals (4-min intervals at 80-95% HRpeak) [29,[45][46][47]. Similar benefits were found for HIIT versus CAET for VĖ=VĊO 2 slope, oxygen uptake efficiency slope [43], partial pressure of end-tidal CO 2 [48], coronary atheroma and plaque characteristics [44] and quality of life [49]. Furthermore, some studies evaluated HIIT versus CAET for effects on blood pressure [43,47,[50][51][52], HR recovery and HR variability [51] as well as systolic function and systolic volumes [29,49] and found no effects of training on these variables.…”

Section: Hiit Versus Caet Programssupporting

confidence: 76%

High-intensity interval training in patients with coronary heart disease: Prescription models and perspectives

Ribeiro

Boidin

Juneau

et al. 2017

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as an alternative and/or complementary exercise modality to continuous aerobic exercise training (CAET) in CHD patients. However, the literature contains descriptions of many HIIT protocols with different stage durations, nature of recovery and intensities. In this review, we discuss the most recent forms of validated HIIT protocols in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and how to prescribe and use them during short- and long-term (phase II and III) cardiac rehabilitation programs. We also compare the superior and/or equivalent short- and long-term effects of HIIT versus CAET on aerobic fitness, cardiovascular function, and quality of life; their efficiency, safety, and tolerance; and exercise adherence. Short interval HIIT was found beneficial for CHD patients with lower aerobic fitness and would ideally be used in initiation and improvement stages. Medium and/or long interval HIIT protocols may be beneficial for CHD patients with higher aerobic fitness, and would be ideally used in the improvement and maintenance stages because of their high physiological stimulus. Finally, we propose progressive individualized models of HIIT programs (phase II to III) for patients with CHD and how to ideally use them according to the clinical status of patients and phase of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

show abstract

Section: Hiit Versus Caet Programssupporting

confidence: 76%

High-intensity interval training in patients with coronary heart disease: Prescription models and perspectives

Ribeiro

Boidin

Juneau

et al. 2017

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They involved assessments of HIIT versus MCT for patients with CAD, including metabolic syndrome (n=10) (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), and CHF, including diastolic dysfunction (n=11) (15,16,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36). In the studies shown in Tables 1 and 2, although the VO2peak was not necessarily the primary endpoint, we presented the VO2peak at baseline and the percentage increase in the VO2peak during the exercise period in order to compare the two groups.…”

Section: Benefits Of Hiitmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Variables other than the VO2peak, in which HIIT is superior to MCT, are summarized in Table 3 (15,16,21,24,26,28,31,32,34).…”

Section: Rcts Comparing Central and Peripheral Adaptations In Hiit Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation is required. This involves optimal medical therapy, education on nutrition and exercise therapy, and smoking cessation. Of these, efficient exercise therapy is a key factor. A highly effective training protocol is therefore warranted, which requires a high rate of compliance. Although moderate-intensity continuous training has been the main training regimen recommended in cardiac rehabilitation guidelines, high-intensity interval training has been reported to be more effective in the clinical and experimental setting from the standpoint of peak oxygen uptake and central and peripheral adaptations. In this review, we illustrate the scientific evidence for highintensity interval training. We then verify this evidence and discuss its significance and the remaining issues.

show abstract

“…However, increases in VO 2max of between 10 and 20% are more typical when sedentary individuals are subjected to a specific period of aerobic exercise training. Moreover, previous investigations have demonstrated an increase in aerobic capacity after aerobic exercise training in patients with different comorbidities such as cardiovascular [9,10] and autoimmune diseases [36].…”

Section: Exercise Training and Aerobic Capacitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Importantly, aerobic exercise training has been recommended as non-pharmacological treatment for patients with a range of different comorbidities [9,10]. In this regard, recent evidence suggests that exercise training has direct effects on improving aerobic capacity and physical function in SLE patients [3,11,12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impaired Aerobic Capacity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: What are the Physiological Mechanisms

AG¹

2015

Rheumatology (Sunnyvale)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease of unknown origin affecting virtually all organ systems. In addition, SLE patients can present limitations in exercise capacity and reduced quality of life due to various clinical conditions such as fatigue, cardiorespiratory disease and muscle involvement. For instance, impaired tissue O 2 transport due to altered convective O 2 transport (product of arterial O 2 content and blood flow) to the working locomotor muscles or O 2 diffusive transport from muscle capillaries to mitochondria is the major determinant of reduced aerobic capacity in patients with SLE. In this respect, scientific evidences suggest that during exercise SLE patients show an attenuated increase in heart rate and systolic volume, reduced ventilatory efficiency and oxidative metabolism impairment.Importantly, recent investigations suggest that aerobic exercise training has direct effects on improving both aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance in SLE patients. Within this context, previous studies suggest that either central or peripheral components are involved in improved aerobic capacity after exercise training program.In this light, the present review sought to clarify the physiological mechanisms associated with reduced aerobic capacity in SLE patients. Secondly, special focus was given to the role of physical training in improving aerobic capacity in these patients as well as to the underlying mechanisms.

show abstract

Effect of continuous and interval exercise training on the PETCO2 response during a graded exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease

Cited by 32 publications

References 20 publications

High-intensity interval training in patients with coronary heart disease: Prescription models and perspectives

High-intensity interval training in patients with coronary heart disease: Prescription models and perspectives

Review of High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Impaired Aerobic Capacity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: What are the Physiological Mechanisms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About