2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2937285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Contextual Interference in the Practicing of a Computer Task in Individuals Poststroke

Abstract: Objectives. Sensory and motor alterations resulting from stroke often impair the performance and learning of motor skills. The present study is aimed at investigating whether and how poststroke individuals and age- and sex-matched healthy controls benefit from a contextual interference effect on the practice of a maze task (i.e., constant vs. random practice) performed on the computer. Methods. Participants included 21 poststroke individuals and 21 healthy controls, matched by sex and age (30 to 80 years). Bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [ 57 ], who organized a practice with a computer task. All these studies found that the non-paretic upper limb can be improved and present similar performance to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [ 57 ], who organized a practice with a computer task. All these studies found that the non-paretic upper limb can be improved and present similar performance to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have been caused by the varied practice that the game provided, since the launching of the table tennis balls was repetitive and random. The literature shows that this type of practice may result in the individual's performing better on the task (20). In this respect, varied practice must be considered during motor rehabilitation, because performance during the attempts may indicate whether the patient has evolved from the cognitive stage to associative and autonomous motor learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%