2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of confinement on the rheology of a yield-stress fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the factor K in the constitutive model of Seth et al (2011) is only occurring in the combination K 2 /E * and both parameters are not independently experimentally verified (Mohan et al (2013b)), so that their absolute values might differ. Also recent simulations by Liu et al (2018) support the key role that the elastic contribution and thus the interparticle pressure term has on the flow behaviour of soft particle suspensions. While these simulations indicate that near-field drag forces (as the f EHD that we use for deriving the square root relation of stress and rate in Equation 11) are subdominant to the far-field (hindered Stokes) drag, they confirm that it is predominantly the elastic force balancing the drag that determines the flow properties, as well as the general time scale of solvent viscosity times the elastic force of Equation 14 or the constitutive model in Seth et al (2011).…”
Section: Microscopic Origin Of Stress In the Flowing Samplementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the factor K in the constitutive model of Seth et al (2011) is only occurring in the combination K 2 /E * and both parameters are not independently experimentally verified (Mohan et al (2013b)), so that their absolute values might differ. Also recent simulations by Liu et al (2018) support the key role that the elastic contribution and thus the interparticle pressure term has on the flow behaviour of soft particle suspensions. While these simulations indicate that near-field drag forces (as the f EHD that we use for deriving the square root relation of stress and rate in Equation 11) are subdominant to the far-field (hindered Stokes) drag, they confirm that it is predominantly the elastic force balancing the drag that determines the flow properties, as well as the general time scale of solvent viscosity times the elastic force of Equation 14 or the constitutive model in Seth et al (2011).…”
Section: Microscopic Origin Of Stress In the Flowing Samplementioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, so far no systematic study for confinement levels above single microgel particle confinement have been performed. A recent study by Liu et al (2018) looked at channel flow of soft microgel particles at different confinement levels, however, not for a uniform deformation rate profile.…”
Section: Hydrogelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third class of studies refers to microscopic flows where the influence of the confinement is expected to play an important role and can not be de-coupled from the wall slip and yielding behaviour, [17][18][19][20]. As compared to the second class, this third class of studies is somewhat less represented although the microscopic wall slip behaviour is relevant to a number of microscopic experimental settings such as the impact and/or atomisation of viscoplastic drops [21][22][23][24] with a number of applications in fuel industry and microscopic blood flows [25,26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found a strong disagreement between the bulk prediction of the velocity profiles and the ones measured in the micro-channels and they attribute this discrepancy to the confinement of the flow. Liu et al [17] compared the measured velocity profiles in microchannels to simulations performed based on the bulk rheology. They show that the confinement effects become important when the dimensions of the channel are comparable to the characteristic size of the material's microstructure and, consequently, the measured velocity profiles differ from those computed numerically using the Herschel-Bulkley constitutive relation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation