2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of concentration on virus removal for ultrafiltration membrane in drinking water production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is established that 96% of all known phages belong to the order Caudovirales , or tailed phages (including T4 and T7) [ 49 ]. MS2 bacteriophage was chosen as it is popularly used as a eukaryotic virus surrogate [ 50 , 51 ]. MS2 is a non-enveloped phage, and it is a positive sense single-stranded RNA virus like SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is established that 96% of all known phages belong to the order Caudovirales , or tailed phages (including T4 and T7) [ 49 ]. MS2 bacteriophage was chosen as it is popularly used as a eukaryotic virus surrogate [ 50 , 51 ]. MS2 is a non-enveloped phage, and it is a positive sense single-stranded RNA virus like SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, the effect of virus feed concentration on UF efficiency has been investigated [61] . At lower concentrations of the three viruses coxsackievirus-B5 (CV-B5) (10 2 – 10 3 ), MS2 phages (10 3 – 10 4 ), and adenovirus type 41 (ADV 41) (10 2 -10 3 ), removal efficiency of about 1 log was observed.…”
Section: Pathogen Removal Using Conventional Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Fig. 4 UF efficiency on high concentrations of virus that were conducted in the laboratory compared to low concentrations of virus that found in groundwater and surface water [61] .
…”
Section: Pathogen Removal Using Conventional Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore size ranging from 1 to 100 nm in this type of membrane can endorse different removal mechanisms such as electrostatic repulsion, attachment as well as size exclusion. It is worth mentioning that based on the reports this kind of treatment is not influenced by the chlorine membrane aging ( Kreiβel et al, 2012 ; Chaudhry et al, 2015a ; Gentile et al, 2018 ; Jacquet et al, 2021 ). NF has attracted greater attention because of its facile manufacturing and very small pore size ranging in 15–40 nm, which increases its efficacy by size exclusion.…”
Section: Virus Removal By Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This phenomenon is not only responsible for the permeability and performance reduction, but also for the energy consumption increase. The deposition of particles, macromolecules and colloids on the membrane surface results in external fouling ( Gopakumar et al, 2017 ; Lu et al, 2017 ; Gentile et al, 2018 ; Roth et al, 2020 ; Jacquet et al, 2021 ). External fouling commonly referred to as the fouling layer is divided into two types: the crust layer and the gel layer.…”
Section: Virus Removal By Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%